Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 10 to 18 of 31

Thread: New Intermat Rankings

  1. #10
    World Champ
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,657

    Default Re: New Intermat Rankings

    Com'on Intermat, you can do better than this.
    Is this what they'd would like to see, or does this reflect reality?

  2. #11

    Default Re: New Intermat Rankings

    In my pre-season sleeper watch Martinez stays at #10, Dake is up to #6.

    Still able to keep patting myself on the back, for now.

  3. #12

    Default Re: New Intermat Rankings

    you would think that they'd get better/more consistent with time...but these are somewhat worse.
    To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.

  4. #13
    Super Moderator Zapp Brannigan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Staten Island, NY
    Posts
    8,269

    Default Re: New Intermat Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by JensenS View Post
    In my pre-season sleeper watch Martinez stays at #10, Dake is up to #6.

    Still able to keep patting myself on the back, for now.
    Alright, but that Martinez ranking is ridiculous, let's be honest. The Dake ranking is probably a little high, but somewhat justifiable.
    Jacob Schlottke---Gone too soon, and the world is a little less bright because of it. RIP, brother.

    One, two, Evans is coming for you...

  5. #14

    Default Re: New Intermat Rankings

    Other than the two Iowa boys (I guess) who currently ranked below Martinez would you move above him?

    Its not like he's a guy that started the year off over ranked (like I will admit Dake did). He was ranked #18 in the first set.

  6. #15
    Super Moderator Zapp Brannigan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Staten Island, NY
    Posts
    8,269

    Default Re: New Intermat Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by JensenS View Post
    Other than the two Iowa boys (I guess) who currently ranked below Martinez would you move above him?

    Its not like he's a guy that started the year off over ranked (like I will admit Dake did). He was ranked #18 in the first set.
    My question is how he moved up? He hasn't exactly beaten any world beaters, with his best win over non-AA Kjar in OT, and he lost to Cornell's back up! Not to say Perrelli is a bum, but it's not exactly and Ellis/Bradley situation at Cornell.
    Jacob Schlottke---Gone too soon, and the world is a little less bright because of it. RIP, brother.

    One, two, Evans is coming for you...

  7. #16

    Default Re: New Intermat Rankings

    I ask again...who currently ranked below Martinez would you move above him?

    If you think that Martinez is ranked too high then there has to be someone.

  8. #17

    Default Re: New Intermat Rankings

    Martinez at #10 feels too high, but there really isn't anyone else with a better argument for the top 10.

    However I maintain that their 141 rankings destroy any credibility this publication might have, so its a moot point.
    Gold is an idiot.

  9. #18
    Olympic Champ r.payton@att.net's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Danville .Indiana
    Posts
    8,718

    Default Re: New Intermat Rankings

    141 is impossible to rank-well ,you could but why ? Last year Thorn started out 13-0 then when he wrestled some comp he went 17-17 losing to William Simpson of Army to end his season . then sunday Levi Jones spanked Mangrum 10-4 , Drouin has 2 wins by 4 points -Duenas and Bailey . My back up has scored more points than my starter -Ciasulli is 3-2 and Melde is 7-2 . IMO, Nauman has been the more impressive of the top 141 's .
    How many matches has Gallick wrestled ?1-2 ?41 was a strange class last year and hasn't changed much .

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •