Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2345678 LastLast
Results 37 to 45 of 67

Thread: Evolution by design

  1. #37
    Olympic Champ
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    On the forums
    Posts
    8,345

    Default

    Most successful Presidential Candidates claim to be either Christian or they hide their true religion or lack of it. Isn't that endorsing Christianity through government?
    Last edited by Big; 04-04-2007 at 10:34 PM.

  2. #38
    Olympic Champ
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    On the forums
    Posts
    8,345

    Default

    What he means is beliefs like Jesus' comeback to Jerusalem requires America's protection of Israel at any cost possible.

  3. #39
    Ancient Arachnid Spider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,424

    Default

    "Could you give an example of what you mean."

    Sure. I think that much of the objection to homosexual marriage is based on what the Bible says. This must not be the basis for judging whether or not homosexuals should have the right to get married. I also think that much of the objection to euthanasia is based on the religious belief that only God can decide when to end a life. I will admit that there are well-meaning people who object to these two things on moral and not religious grounds, but it is not right for people to impose their religious beliefs on others regarding such issues. Politicians and ethicists can argue these issues, but the Pope and other religious leaders should butt out. The Pope can tell Catholics what to do, but he shouldn't be able to tell me what to do.

  4. #40
    Olympic Champ
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    On the forums
    Posts
    8,345

    Default

    Spider,

    What if a rabbi says homosexuals and euthanasia are immoral?

  5. #41
    Ancient Arachnid Spider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,424

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Big View Post
    Spider,

    What if a rabbi says homosexuals and euthanasia are immoral?
    He can say whatever he wants and can tell his congregation how they should behave. When he tells them how to vote, he's overstepping his bounds because he's trying to impose his [religious, I assume] beliefs on everyone else.

    Bedtime for the Spider. See ya tomorrrow.

  6. #42
    Super Moderator UGLY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Littleton, CO
    Posts
    4,935

    Default

    So is it ok for those who non religious views to vote and have their veiws "forced" on the religious?

  7. #43
    Round of 12
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Norwood, Pa.
    Posts
    477

    Default

    The most secure of scientific facts are built upon sand, for example:

    http://jamesphogan.com/bb/bulletin.php?id=1091

    It's interesting isn't it that the very nature of the sun, which everyone believed to be a nuclear furnace, can be debated but evolution by natural selection is held to be above reproach! The reason for this is obvipus, natural selection is the creation myth of the atheist, no one likes to have their creation myth, their metaphysical belief, gored.

  8. #44
    Ancient Arachnid Spider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,424

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UGLY View Post
    So is it ok for those who non religious views to vote and have their veiws "forced" on the religious?
    Not a valid question. That's equivalent to saying fat people can vote and "force" thin people to gain weight. It's none of the govenment's business how people worship as long as they don't break any laws, but the flip side of that coin is that the government can't get involved in religious pursuits.

    It is necessary to keep religion out of government, and is not the result of liberal atheists trampling the rights of the religious. When the government (local, state or federal) acts to endorse any religion it is acting inappropriately. Everyone has the right to worship as they please (even atheists) and not have to be told by his or her government that it supports some other religion.

  9. #45
    Ancient Arachnid Spider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,424

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oc View Post
    The most secure of scientific facts are built upon sand, for example:

    http://jamesphogan.com/bb/bulletin.php?id=1091

    It's interesting isn't it that the very nature of the sun, which everyone believed to be a nuclear furnace, can be debated but evolution by natural selection is held to be above reproach! The reason for this is obvipus, natural selection is the creation myth of the atheist, no one likes to have their creation myth, their metaphysical belief, gored.

    No, OC, scientific facts are based upon empirical data and reproducable observations. They are not etched in stone, but are always subject to revision as technology improves and new data arises. What science doesn't do is rely on one two thousand year old book as its foundation.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •