Wrestling Talk | NCAA, High School, Pro, & College Wrestling
Wrestling Gear
Wrestling Shoes Wrestling Headgear Wrestling Singlets
Wrestling Kneepads Discount Shoes Wrestling Bags
wrestling

Go Back   The Wrestling Talk Forums > Politics & Religion
TWT Search:




Even water supplies can't afford capitalism

Politics & Religion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes Language
Old 10-26-2007, 08:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
Olympic Champ
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: On the forums
Posts: 8,320
My Mood:
Tournaments Joined: 0
Tournament Wins: 0
Big has won some fansBig has won some fansBig has won some fans

Awards Showcase
Russian Poster of the Year 
Total Awards: 1

Default Even water supplies can't afford capitalism

Constant growth with no end is just not possible for much longer and even American water supplies are a good example of that:


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071026/...anishing_water
Send me a PM Send Me a Gift My Albums
Reply With Quote


Old 10-27-2007, 04:48 AM   #2 (permalink)
AA
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 550
Tournaments Joined: 0
Tournament Wins: 0
skipster has won some fansskipster has won some fans
Default Re: Even water supplies can't afford capitalism

On the contrary, I think this situation highlights how government screws up resource management and how capitalism produces the best results. But, municcpal water treatment and delivery is not a capitalist venture -- it is mroe of a socialistic venture. The government owns the water source, owns the method of treatment and delivery, and charges a set rate that can not be increased or decreased without going through some government process.

If municipal water were a capitalist system, the price would fluctuate with supply and demand. As the supply of water decreases (cases like Atlanta), the price per unit water would increase, which would curb discretionary use. If the resource becomes more expensive, its efficient use will become more common -- people will save water because they won't want to pay the higher bills.

As the system is set up now, there is little incentive to save water or use it more efficiently because it is such a cheap product. I live a couple of hours away from Atlanta and I have heard that they have 80-100 days of estimated water supply left, if no rainfall occurs and demand remains steady. It is difficult for people to think that they might run out of water three months in the future whiel the faucet runs just as smoothly now as it did years ago. The see little incentive to save water -- it just doesn't feel like there's a problem. But, if they know that each gallon of water they use costs them 20 times what it used to, they might pay attention. They will certainly curb their extraneous water use when they get their bill at the end of the month -- which will allow them to adjust their habits before the 80-100 day window expires.

The problem is not growth -- this problem was not experienced beforethis exceptional drought. The problem is the poor management of the resource. This is just another example of how government screws up resources and how the free market would solve some problems. Remember, the free market is the only process by which resources are impartially allocated to where they are most dear.
Send me a PM Send Me a Gift My Albums
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Guest Ads (Remove)
Advertise Here
Wrestling Gear
Upgrade to Remove

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by SEO 3.2.0 RC7