Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Eustace mullins on NA=National socialism-ZI=zionist

  1. #1
    Olympic Champ r.payton@att.net's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Danville .Indiana
    Posts
    8,718

    Default Eustace mullins on NA=National socialism-ZI=zionist

    THE NAZI ZIONIST PARTY AND THE HOLOCAUST - YouTube

    Read the transfer agreement by black-a secret agreement between zionists and National Socialists
    You know, I think I would rather be a man than a god . We don't need anyone to believe in us. We just keep going anyhow. It's what we do.

  2. #2
    Olympic Champ kr1963's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Clearwater, Florida, United States
    Posts
    7,028

    Default Re: Eustace mullins on NA=National socialism-ZI=zionist

    SEE the Balfour Agreement....

    The Transfer Agreement documents the agreement between Adolf Hitler and an organization of Zionist Jews in 1933, which made Hitler "the chief economic sponsor of the state of Israel". A sweeping, worldwide economic boycott of Germany by Jews helped spur a deal between the Nazis and Zionists. At that time, there were few Jews in Palestine, but from 1933 through 1936, 60,000 German Jews immigrated into the region, bringing with them $100,000,000 dollars ($1.6 billion in 2009 dollars)

    The Transfer Agreement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Hitler was a british agent - War Hitler ein britischer Agent ???
    War Hitler ein britischer Agent ??? - YouTube
    A Wes Mann Production. A copy can be purchased from Conspiracy King | Comspiracy King

    The people also who carried out the extermination of the jews in Germany were Psychiatrists. SEE T-4. All based upon Eugenics.

  3. #3
    Olympic Champ r.payton@att.net's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Danville .Indiana
    Posts
    8,718

    Default Re: Eustace mullins on NA=National socialism-ZI=zionist

    Typical British BS-
    The Balfour and the Arabs;
    From Publishers Weekly

    According to Schneer (London 1900), an expert in modern British history at Georgia Tech, intrigue and British doubledealing defined the 1917 Balfour Declaration of British support for a Jewish "national home" in Palestine as much as bravery and vision, leading to the disillusionment, distrust, and resentment that still dominate the region today. British Jewish chemist and Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann orchestrated the campaign to persuade powerful men that support for Zionism would benefit Britain's wartime cause and the ensuing peace. Perhaps most shrewdly, Weizmann lobbied former prime minister Arthur James Balfour, then a member of Britain's War Council. Meanwhile, Grand Sharif Hussein and his sons had won British backing for an Arab kingdom, which would presumably include Palestine, and with British encouragement rebelled against the Ottomans in 1916. Through British duplicity, the French also believed they had a interest in Palestine. And three months after the Balfour Declaration, British prime minister Lloyd George proposed a separate peace with Turkey, with the Ottomans remaining in Palestine. This perceptive, complex book will best be appreciated by Middle East historians, analysts, and policy wonks possessing a substantial prior understanding of the intricacies of the region and its players. 16 pages of b&w photos; 7 maps.
    Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    You know, I think I would rather be a man than a god . We don't need anyone to believe in us. We just keep going anyhow. It's what we do.

  4. #4
    Olympic Champ kr1963's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Clearwater, Florida, United States
    Posts
    7,028

    Default Re: Eustace mullins on NA=National socialism-ZI=zionist

    Amazon.com: Bible and Sword: England and Palestine from the Bronze Age to Balfour (9780345314277): Barbara W. Tuchman: Books

    The thesis is compelling, namely that the Balfour Declaration was the scion of twin progenitors--the Christian motivation to restore the Jews to the promised land as a prerequisite to the second coming of Christ and the imperial motivation to control the vital Mediterranean commercial route to India and the Far East. Interestingly, Tuchman makes it clear that, with several individual exceptions, these motivations had nothing to do with concern for the Jews but rather originated from the spiritual and temporal aspirations of Britain. Once again the PR & the actual intentions do not add up do they?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •