Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 9 of 30

Thread: Budget deficit dives -- again

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default Budget deficit dives -- again

    Maybe things aren't as bad as some claim, after all. It looks like those tax cuts are working, too. We're in a war-spending situation and the tax cuts are STILL increasing government revenue.



    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119189497675953035.html?mod=rss_Today's_Most_Pop ular

    The Shrinking Deficit

    The Congressional Budget Office has released its preliminary estimates for Fiscal Year 2007 that ended September 30, and the federal budget deficit fell again, this time by 35% to $161 billion.

    Since 2004, deficit spending has tumbled by $251 billion, which is one of the most rapid three-year declines in U.S. history.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdoc.cfm?index=8654&type=0

    The budget surplus was about $113 billion in September, CBO estimates, $57 billion more than the surplus recorded in the same month last year. The government typically runs a surplus in September because of the influx of revenues from quarterly tax payments.

    CBO estimates that the federal deficit was about $161 billion in 2007, down from $248 billion in the previous year.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

  2. #2

    Default Re: Budget deficit dives -- again

    Let me get this right now. The national debt is now over 9.1 TRILLION dollars. In 2006 the US government spent $406 BILLION dollars of OUR money on interest payments to holders of our national debt. For the fiscal year 2007 we added at a minimum 161 BILLION to this total that we will have to pay back principal and interest on and........you would like us to celebrate the
    wonderful job that our elected officials are doing managing the countries fiscal health. Oh, I almost forgot to yell yipee in regard to the tax cuts. Yipee.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Budget deficit dives -- again

    Can you read?? The thread is about a budget deficit, NOT a national debt!! If you don't know the difference, just say so and someone on this board will gladly help you.

    If you want to decrease the national debt a bit, cash in you savings bonds. The national debt is made entirely of government bonds -- mostly owned by US citizens. I don't think the government is in danger of going bankrupt to its own citizens, is it?

  4. #4
    Olympic Champ
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    It's a long way from East Colorado
    Posts
    3,740

    Default Re: Budget deficit dives -- again

    Quote Originally Posted by skipster View Post
    Can you read?? The thread is about a budget deficit, NOT a national debt!! If you don't know the difference, just say so and someone on this board will gladly help you.
    I figured any discussion of a budget deficit would naturally lead to the issue of national debt--in the same way that if I spend more than I planned (and earned) in a month, and can't pay off my credit cards, that credit card debt becomes an isssue. I guess I need help too.

  5. #5
    Olympic Champ
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Parker, Az
    Posts
    3,388

    Default Re: Budget deficit dives -- again

    I figured any discussion of a budget deficit would naturally lead to the issue of national debt--in the same way that if I spend more than I planned (and earned) in a month, and can't pay off my credit cards, that credit card debt becomes an isssue. I guess I need help too.

    You mean I have to pay off the debt I run up on my credit cards????

    Oh crap, I think I screwed up!
    I am 49, bald, ugly, and don't own a single cool thing. Kids like me though.

  6. #6
    Olympic Champ
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    It's a long way from East Colorado
    Posts
    3,740

    Default Re: Budget deficit dives -- again

    Quote Originally Posted by sgallan View Post
    You mean I have to pay off the debt I run up on my credit cards????
    Aw, don't worry about it. Just bask in the glow of knowing that you met your budget this month.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Budget deficit dives -- again

    Quote Originally Posted by skipster View Post
    Can you read?? The thread is about a budget deficit, NOT a national debt!! If you don't know the difference, just say so and someone on this board will gladly help you.

    If you want to decrease the national debt a bit, cash in you savings bonds. The national debt is made entirely of government bonds -- mostly owned by US citizens. I don't think the government is in danger of going bankrupt to its own citizens, is it?
    Yes Skippy, I can read. Can you comprehend or did I hit a nerve with my reply?

    The economy is the sum total of all of its parts, not just hand picked "good news" numbers. If you have a problem seeing the big picture then I am sure that there are others on here that will gladly help you out.

    Opps! They already did.

    By the way, the national debt is not mostly owned by US citizens . I will be happy to share the actual breakdown of who does hold the debt if you are interested.

  8. #8
    Olympic Champ
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Parker, Az
    Posts
    3,388

    Default Re: Budget deficit dives -- again

    Don't go there Hardcore. I used to try to chime in on these sorts of threads. What usually ended up happening is I spent a LOT of time, and posts, defining the basics of Macroeconomics at the freshman/sophmore business major type level, all I would get in return would be sound bites, and dogma. Occasionally I would get cruel and get into economics at a higher technical math, technical terms, curves, graphing type level...... but really it got to be a waste of time.

    To those who think I am insulting your intelligence....... I'm not. I am insulting your ignorance. There is a difference.
    I am 49, bald, ugly, and don't own a single cool thing. Kids like me though.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Budget deficit dives -- again

    Quote Originally Posted by sgallan View Post
    Don't go there Hardcore. I used to try to chime in on these sorts of threads. What usually ended up happening is I spent a LOT of time, and posts, defining the basics of Macroeconomics at the freshman/sophmore business major type level, all I would get in return would be sound bites, and dogma. Occasionally I would get cruel and get into economics at a higher technical math, technical terms, curves, graphing type level...... but really it got to be a waste of time.

    To those who think I am insulting your intelligence....... I'm not. I am insulting your ignorance. There is a difference.
    That's about the funniest thing I've heard. Gallan, you're just like Big and clone -- your posts lack substance. Big says that since he didn't get a raise, no one did. Clone says he's right just because he is, ne evidence necessary. You never explained economics at all -- I had to explain it to you. You simly held your kid up as a human shield and screamed that anyone who disagreed with you wanted to kill her.

    Please don't stop taking your medication again.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •