TWT
 
Register Forums Photos Videos Results Rankings Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-14-2009, 01:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
Olympic Champ
 
Ground&Pound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: WPIAL, PA
Posts: 2,615
Ground&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National Champion
Default Anti-abortion on non-relgious grounds

I tend to lean anti-abortion, however religion has nothing to do with it.

I think that scientifically, an embryo with its own unique set of DNA is a human life. I most certainly think that a fetus with a beating heart is a human being.

Destroying either, in my scientific opinion, would constitute ending a human life.

It is against the law to shot a bald eagle and it is also illegal to steal bald eagle eggs from a nest.

However, I make exceptions for rape, incest, and if the mother’s life is in danger.
__________________
Ground&Pound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2009, 01:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
Ancient Arachnid
 
Spider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,247
Spider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a Legend
Default Re: Anti-abortion on non-relgious grounds

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ground&Pound View Post
I tend to lean anti-abortion, however religion has nothing to do with it.

I think that scientifically, an embryo with its own unique set of DNA is a human life. I most certainly think that a fetus with a beating heart is a human being.

Destroying either, in my scientific opinion, would constitute ending a human life.

It is against the law to shot a bald eagle and it is also illegal to steal bald eagle eggs from a nest.

However, I make exceptions for rape, incest, and if the mother’s life is in danger.
While I don't completely agree, I find this argument very reasonable (except the egg part). I appreciate that many conservative points of view are viable without a religious basis, and these should be seriously considered and debated by our lawmakers.
__________________
"Love never dies." The Beatles
Spider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2009, 01:36 PM   #3 (permalink)
NCAA Champ
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,137
FloggingSully is an All AmericanFloggingSully is an All AmericanFloggingSully is an All AmericanFloggingSully is an All AmericanFloggingSully is an All American
Default Re: Anti-abortion on non-relgious grounds

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ground&Pound View Post
I think that scientifically, an embryo with its own unique set of DNA is a human life. I most certainly think that a fetus with a beating heart is a human being.
But, even if that embryo is a human life, it's still a parasite and is dependent on another human being's internal organs to stay alive. I don't believe that the government should be able to require a person to share their organs with another person.
__________________
There's no such thing as a pretty good aligator wrestler.
FloggingSully is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2009, 01:41 PM   #4 (permalink)
Ancient Arachnid
 
Spider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,247
Spider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a Legend
Default Re: Anti-abortion on non-relgious grounds

Quote:
Originally Posted by FloggingSully View Post
I don't believe that the government should be able to require a person to share their organs with another person.
So should one conjoined twin who shares a heart with another be allowed to kill his brother?
__________________
"Love never dies." The Beatles
Spider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2009, 01:54 PM   #5 (permalink)
Olympic Champ
 
Ground&Pound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: WPIAL, PA
Posts: 2,615
Ground&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National Champion
Default Re: Anti-abortion on non-relgious grounds

Not considering rape, that "parasite" was not acquired like the common cold.

The mother should take some responsibility for human life in which she played a major role in creating.
__________________
Ground&Pound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2009, 01:58 PM   #6 (permalink)
Ancient Arachnid
 
Spider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,247
Spider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a LegendSpider is a Legend
Default Re: Anti-abortion on non-relgious grounds

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ground&Pound View Post

I think that scientifically, an embryo with its own unique set of DNA is a human life. I most certainly think that a fetus with a beating heart is a human being.
Tissue cultures of heart cells can beat like a heart, but they are not embyos and have no potential for becoming embryos. A heartbeat is not a litmus test for a human being with a right to life.
__________________
"Love never dies." The Beatles
Spider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2009, 02:15 PM   #7 (permalink)
NCAA Champ
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,137
FloggingSully is an All AmericanFloggingSully is an All AmericanFloggingSully is an All AmericanFloggingSully is an All AmericanFloggingSully is an All American
Default Re: Anti-abortion on non-relgious grounds

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spider View Post
So should one conjoined twin who shares a heart with another be allowed to kill his brother?
Maybe 'share' wasn't the right word, how about 'lend'?

Neither of the conjoined twins are lending their heart to the other one, it's always been both of theirs.
__________________
There's no such thing as a pretty good aligator wrestler.
FloggingSully is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2009, 02:17 PM   #8 (permalink)
NCAA Champ
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,137
FloggingSully is an All AmericanFloggingSully is an All AmericanFloggingSully is an All AmericanFloggingSully is an All AmericanFloggingSully is an All American
Default Re: Anti-abortion on non-relgious grounds

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ground&Pound View Post
The mother should take some responsibility for human life in which she played a major role in creating.
I don't disagree about what she should do, I'm talking about what the government should/shouldn't force her to do.
__________________
There's no such thing as a pretty good aligator wrestler.
FloggingSully is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2009, 03:07 PM   #9 (permalink)
Olympic Champ
 
Ground&Pound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: WPIAL, PA
Posts: 2,615
Ground&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National Champion
Default Re: Anti-abortion on non-relgious grounds

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spider View Post
Tissue cultures of heart cells can beat like a heart, but they are not embyos and have no potential for becoming embryos. A heartbeat is not a litmus test for a human being with a right to life.
I realize that I don't speak for the entire scientific community, but in my book a heartbeat = a life.

Tissue cultures that were manipulated by man to grow in an artificial environment are not the same as a naturally conceived embryo inside of a woman's womb.

The embryo, without human interference, will in most likelihood become a viable human being. The tissue sample will not.


As far as I know, marijuana seeds are illegal to possess. They are not marijuana plants, but the contain an embryo of one. In this case embryo = life.

The same with bald eagle eggs. embryo = life.
__________________
Ground&Pound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2009, 03:13 PM   #10 (permalink)
Olympic Champ
 
Ground&Pound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: WPIAL, PA
Posts: 2,615
Ground&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National ChampionGround&Pound is a National Champion
Default Re: Anti-abortion on non-relgious grounds

Quote:
Originally Posted by FloggingSully View Post
I don't disagree about what she should do, I'm talking about what the government should/shouldn't force her to do.
We force the father to pay for the baby when it's born. Why can't we force the mother to do her part before it's born.




If the mother abandons the newborn, it's murder.

If she aborts the embryo/fetus then it's ok.

When do we draw the line? 1st trimester? 2nd trimester?

In my opinion based on my understanding of biology, I feel the embryo, fetus & newborn are one in the same.
__________________
Ground&Pound is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
antiabortion, grounds, nonrelgious

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0