Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678
Results 64 to 72 of 72

Thread: US SCt Rules for Ricci; against City of New Haven

  1. #64

    Default Re: US SCt Rules for Ricci; against City of New Haven

    Whether it did or not, thats not what I found funny about it.

    Given the way that certain members here conduct themselves some of (matclone), or all of the time (washedupwrestler/slayer/password/etc...) it takes a lot of gall for them to accuse other people of being "angry".

    Thats what I found funny.

  2. #65

    Default Re: US SCt Rules for Ricci; against City of New Haven

    When Matclone referred to the Angry White Man in a suit, he's talking about "news" commentators like Glenn Beck, Bill O"Reilly, et al....you know, the angry talk show host telling you to be angry about what's going on in the country?.....
    Your ignorance is painful to witness.....

  3. #66

    Default Re: US SCt Rules for Ricci; against City of New Haven

    I know what he meant, and you kind of made my point for me.

    When matclone accuses people of doing/believing whatever the AWMIAS tells them to do, he is in a sense accusing people of being "angry" as well.

    Then when he comes in here on occasions and calls people "sorry assed losers" and "dumbfucks" he kind of sounds a little angry himself.

  4. #67
    Olympic Champ
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    It's a long way from East Colorado
    Posts
    3,740

    Default Re: US SCt Rules for Ricci; against City of New Haven

    Yes, I'm on edge. Chance has taken to throwing a tantrum and calling me names every time concepts and terms are used that he doesn't understand. I'm human too, and about the 5th time in a row he calls me an asshole (see his second post on this thread, page 3), my response may not be so civilized.

    Jensen, apparently you don't understand the Angry White Man in the Suit. His is a mock anger and it is designed to stir others to anger. There's a difference between the Angry White Man's artificial anger and the genuine anger that might be expressed, for example, in response to unjust and false arguments, or the thoughtless parroting of the same. I didn't think the concept was that difficult, especially since I've taken pains to explain it before.

  5. #68
    Super Moderator UGLY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Littleton, CO
    Posts
    4,935

    Default Re: US SCt Rules for Ricci; against City of New Haven

    So you call me names in order to get back at chance? Nice.

    I will continue to stand by my claim and it cant be that ignorant considering Alito feels a similar way. Or do you believe Alito to be a sorry ass loser or dumb fuck. Also I am not angry at all, I have no reason to be. The decision went the way I wanted it to. You are the angry one. You can try to make shit up on the fly like "mock anger" or whatever. The fact is that you perceive any grievance of that white people make as invalid and you see it as bigotry or hate. There could never be a legit case for a white person to be dismayed with the system because white people have and do run the system. You are a bleeding heart who only wants equality and fairness to swing one direction because of the past. You cant live in the present and its sad.

    Where can I get my "AWMIAS" membership card and free t-shirt. Shawn Hannity should have some I guess.

    What would we consider Kieth Olbermann, oh my mistake only conservative commentators can be considered AWMIAS.

  6. #69

    Default Re: US SCt Rules for Ricci; against City of New Haven

    Chance and Matclone really piss each other off for some reason, it's become a pattern on several threads. Not sure if their views or worldviews are so diametrically opposed, or if they push each others buttons, or what it is. I've disagreed with both of them before without getting called names or anything.

  7. #70

    Default Re: US SCt Rules for Ricci; against City of New Haven

    Quote Originally Posted by matclone View Post

    Jensen, apparently you don't understand the Angry White Man in the Suit.
    Wrong.

    Quote Originally Posted by matclone View Post
    His is a mock anger
    I understand that...

    Quote Originally Posted by matclone View Post
    and it is designed to stir others to anger.
    Ugly, Chance, and other people "like them." They buy into the "mock anger" thereby becoming angry themselves.

    Quote Originally Posted by matclone View Post
    There's a difference between the Angry White Man's artificial anger and the genuine anger that might be expressed, for example, in response to unjust and false arguments, or the thoughtless parroting of the same.
    I understand that, however I'm not talking about the AWMITS's "artificial anger."

    I'm talking about the assumed real anger that you're accusing Ugly, and Chance of possessing because they've bought into the false anger of the AWMITS.

    My original post commented on the fact that I found it funny that you accused them of being angry (because they bought into the AWMITS's false anger) yet in calling people sorry assed losers and dumbfucks you seem quite angry yourself at times.

    Quote Originally Posted by matclone View Post
    I didn't think the concept was that difficult.
    Likewise...

  8. #71
    Olympic Champ
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    It's a long way from East Colorado
    Posts
    3,740

    Default Re: US SCt Rules for Ricci; against City of New Haven

    Quote Originally Posted by JensenS
    I'm talking about the assumed real anger that you're accusing Ugly, and Chance of possessing because they've bought into the false anger of the AWMITS.

    My original post commented on the fact that I found it funny that you accused them of being angry (because they bought into the AWMITS's false anger)
    Although my invocation of the Angry White Man in the Suit (first raised on page 5 of this thread) implies that someone is stirred up, unless I missed it, I never directly accused anyone of being angry on this post--which why I didn't understand your comment that I accused someone of being angry. Clearly, I raised the man in the suit (only after discussing a lot of stuff about the Ricci case history and seeing the responses) to suggest that certain opinions were influenced by the same.

    Quote Originally Posted by JensenS
    yet in calling people sorry assed losers and dumbfucks you seem quite angry yourself at times.
    I thought I acknowledged that.
    Last edited by matclone; 07-05-2009 at 10:34 AM.

  9. #72

    Default Re: US SCt Rules for Ricci; against City of New Haven

    Quote Originally Posted by matclone View Post
    I never directly accused anyone of being angry on this post--
    I never said you directly accused anyone of being angry.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •