Quote Originally Posted by RYou View Post
Actually, the "equation" represents a sense of perspective.

P -> Q (me: character determines conduct) - as viewed introspectively

Q -> P (RU: conduct determines character) - as viewed by others.

In reality P (Active Character) -> Q (conflict) -> P (Reactive Character)
...No ?

I didn't get the above from your first post. I think you mean:

Active Character -> [ (Certain behavior in conflicts) & (perceptions of Active Character) ]


I am not sure if the sentence can be translated into SL very well (no pun) b/c there really isn't a translation for "because" which may be part of what you are saying...that certain "reactive characters" exist because of behavior, but those certainly wouldn't necessarily exist which is why the conditional sentences would not be appropriate