# Attention mathematicians: Help

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 3 of 4 First 1234 Last
• 06-24-2011, 12:23 PM
ODH
Re: Attention mathematicians: Help
The truth is that 48/2(9+3) is not a good way to write a mathematical expression becuase it so easily can be interpreted different ways.
Because of the limits of the standard characters on the keyboard, a little extra effort needs to be made when writing expression on the computer to clarify when the intent is.
• 06-24-2011, 12:53 PM
Spider
Re: Attention mathematicians: Help
Quote:

Originally Posted by ODH
The truth is that 48/2(9+3) is not a good way to write a mathematical expression becuase it so easily can be interpreted different ways.
Because of the limits of the standard characters on the keyboard, a little extra effort needs to be made when writing expression on the computer to clarify when the intent is.

Excellent answer. If the fraction had been written vertically with 48 over the viniculum (the dividing line) over the 2, it would be obvious whether the factor (9+3) were even with the viniculum multiplying the whole fraction, or in the denominator multiplying only the 2.
• 06-24-2011, 01:06 PM
quinn14
Re: Attention mathematicians: Help
Quote:

Originally Posted by Spider
Excellent answer. If the fraction had been written vertically with 48 over the viniculum (the dividing line) over the 2, it would be obvious whether the factor (9+3) were even with the viniculum multiplying the whole fraction, or in the denominator multiplying only the 2.

Never heard that word in my life. Damn show off! :)
• 06-24-2011, 03:02 PM
RYou
Re: Attention mathematicians: Help
• 06-24-2011, 05:57 PM
Spider
Re: Attention mathematicians: Help
Quote:

Originally Posted by quinn14
Never heard that word in my life. Damn show off! :)

Don't tell anyone, but neither did I. I looked it up for my post.
• 06-24-2011, 07:19 PM
pm01
Re: Attention mathematicians: Help
I personally feel the equation is fair and straight forward. I don't see anything ambiguous about it and come to the answer of 288. I just simply followed the order of operations (parens, no exp, then fundamental left-to-right calcs). But what I think is interesting how this equation (no matter one's answer) triggers such fierce and facinaring debate on other boards.
• 06-24-2011, 07:38 PM
pm01
Re: Attention mathematicians: Help
• 06-24-2011, 10:31 PM
RYou
Re: Attention mathematicians: Help
• 06-25-2011, 12:25 AM
quinn14
Re: Attention mathematicians: Help
I don't know whether I should be happy that Hitler agreed with me or I should dump my answer and just yell "2"!!
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 3 of 4 First 1234 Last