Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

  1. #1
    NCAA Champ WhippetGrappler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Moved to Suffolk, VA
    Posts
    1,281

    Default U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

    While you were watching the oil spill, the New York failed terrorist bombing and other critical crises, Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN. OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND USES IT. IF THIS PASSES, THERE COULDBE WAR
    On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States
    On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States. The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened.
    Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment. This has happened in other countries, past and present!THIS IS NOT A JOKE OR A FALSE WARNING.As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control. Read the Article U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto. The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article Here
    Click on the link below for further acknowledgement?..http://www.reuters.com/article/polit...59E0Q920091015
    BRUTUS BUCKEYE WILL TAKE YOU DOWN...

  2. #2

    Default Re: U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

    O.K., I am a firm supporter of the 2nd Amendment - However - hysterical rhetoric like this hurts our cause, not helps it. Read the Reuters piece - Ms. Clinton didn't sign ANYTHING - the U.S. government has indicated that it is willing to begin talks on a treaty.
    It has nothing to do with domestic sales (other than the "slippery slope" arguement - which I would tend to agree with), it concerns sales to national states.
    What this really does is commit the U.S. to talks about a treaty. With the U.S. committed to insisting on consensus - giving every signee "veto" rights. That would give this agency the same effectiveness as the U.N. Security Council - anybody with a veto can stop any action the council tries to take.

    If you want to argue against this action (and I think there are cogent arguements against it), wonderful. But the hyperbole gives ammunition to the gun-control freaks - "there you go - another hysterical red-neck gunner going off the deep end".

    R.I.P. Cyrano and Roxanne.

  3. #3

    Default Re: U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

    I can't believe that chain emails could ever be wrong. No need to actually read about these things though, just believe the emails, add pretty colors, and hope everyone else has equally low standards, and maybe you can convince some people.

    http://www.factcheck.org/2009/12/int...un-ban-treaty/

  4. #4
    Olympic Champ
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Parker, Az
    Posts
    3,388

    Default Re: U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

    It is on the internet so it must be true.

    Speaking of being on the internet so it must be true look what I got today....

    Congrats.Confirm receipt (1,000,000.00 GBP) by sending your Name, Address,Age,Tel,Etc to ( mr.michaelsmith002@9.cn )

    How long does it take for me to get my money? Hopefully soon as I already maxed out all my cards figuring I am getting this money.
    I am 49, bald, ugly, and don't own a single cool thing. Kids like me though.

  5. #5

    Default Re: U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

    Quote Originally Posted by WhippetGrappler View Post
    While you were watching the oil spill, the New York failed terrorist bombing and other critical crises, Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN. OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND USES IT. IF THIS PASSES, THERE COULDBE WAR
    On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States
    On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States. The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened.
    Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment. This has happened in other countries, past and present!THIS IS NOT A JOKE OR A FALSE WARNING.As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control. Read the Article U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto. The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article Here
    Click on the link below for further acknowledgement?..http://www.reuters.com/article/polit...59E0Q920091015
    Have you gotten your bill yet for all the e-mail charges? Man, mine was $39,431.52

    Now I'm in the poorhouse.

  6. #6

    Default Re: U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

    But the hyperbole gives ammunition to the gun-control freaks - "there you go - another hysterical red-neck gunner going off the deep end".

    No ammunition needed. All one has to do is read up on McVeigh and one pretty much grasps where the gun nuts come from.

  7. #7
    Olympic Champ
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Parker, Az
    Posts
    3,388

    Default Re: U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

    Quote Originally Posted by washed up wrestler View Post
    Have you gotten your bill yet for all the e-mail charges? Man, mine was $39,431.52

    Now I'm in the poorhouse.
    Oh crap..... I think I messed up!!!!!
    I am 49, bald, ugly, and don't own a single cool thing. Kids like me though.

  8. #8

    Default Re: U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

    I'm joining this group sometime next week. Read about it on the internet, so it must be legit. Sure it sounds crazy, but I don't have time to look into it. It's on the net, and that's good for me.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ra?lism

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •