Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 10 to 18 of 38
Discuss Activist Supreme Court spits on Democracy at the Politics & Religion within the Wrestling Talk Forums; Originally Posted by LkwdSteve Obama was outraged? I saw some of his quotes in this ...
  1. #10
    World Champ
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Lakewood
    Posts
    2,443

    Default Re: Activist Supreme Court spits on Democracy

    Quote Originally Posted by LkwdSteve View Post
    Obama was outraged?
    I saw some of his quotes in this morning's paper. Yep. He wasn't in agreement with the court.




    By the way, I am confused by the title of this thread. Activist? Spitting on democracy??
    DSCH: a Soviet artist's reply to unjust criticism.

  2. #11
    Olympic Champ quinn14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,754

    Default Re: Activist Supreme Court spits on Democracy

    That's the part I don't understand. Some of his main contributors were banks and he was quoted as saying that this decision helped them and he didn't like that. He also said it would lead to a stampede of special intrest money in our politics. Isn't that what labor unions are? And isn't the money already there? Both sides are on the take with special intrest groups and this will just make it more annoying to the public because of all of the political ads we will have to endure.

  3. #12
    NCAA Champ
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    1,406

    Default Re: Activist Supreme Court spits on Democracy

    Quote Originally Posted by LkwdSteve View Post
    By the way, I am confused by the title of this thread. Activist?
    When a court makes a ruling you don't like it means they're activists.
    There's no such thing as a pretty good aligator wrestler.

  4. #13
    AA
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Nor Cal
    Posts
    568

    Default Re: Activist Supreme Court spits on Democracy

    It was an activist ruling. Even John McCain agrees.

    The Obama contributors were also buttressed by the millions of individuals who reached into their pockets as were contributed by corporations.

    Compare the amount of individal contributors and the $ total and it doesn't come remotely close to McCain/Palin.

    The reality is that corporations rule the roost for both sides. It's disgusting on many levels. Just look at the health insurance lobby during the protracted HCR negotiations. Do you think Lieberman was open minded about the public option? His wife is in the industry and he took huge $ from the Conn based corporations.

    There is no such thing as competition anymore. Hell, my huge company is almost as bad with the $ they throw around.

  5. #14
    Olympic Champ quinn14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,754

    Default Re: Activist Supreme Court spits on Democracy

    Quote Originally Posted by washed up wrestler View Post
    It was an activist ruling. Even John McCain agrees.

    The Obama contributors were also buttressed by the millions of individuals who reached into their pockets as were contributed by corporations.

    Compare the amount of individal contributors and the $ total and it doesn't come remotely close to McCain/Palin.

    The reality is that corporations rule the roost for both sides. It's disgusting on many levels. Just look at the health insurance lobby during the protracted HCR negotiations. Do you think Lieberman was open minded about the public option? His wife is in the industry and he took huge $ from the Conn based corporations.

    There is no such thing as competition anymore. Hell, my huge company is almost as bad with the $ they throw around.

    You make my point. That is why I can't understand why this ruling even matters, except for us having to watch more commercials than usual. Obama saying that he doesn't agree with the ruling is as hypocritical as anyone else saying the same thing.

  6. #15
    NCAA Champ
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,041

    Default Re: Activist Supreme Court spits on Democracy

    I agree with the Supreme Courts' action to quash the limit on "corporate political speech." I don't like embellished political attack ads but did not like bill limiting the speech either. I see the decision as reasonable and logical.

  7. #16
    NCAA Champ
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,041

    Default Re: Activist Supreme Court spits on Democracy

    Quote Originally Posted by washed up wrestler View Post
    It was an activist ruling. Even John McCain agrees.

    The Obama contributors were also buttressed by the millions of individuals who reached into their pockets as were contributed by corporations.

    Compare the amount of individal contributors and the $ total and it doesn't come remotely close to McCain/Palin.

    The reality is that corporations rule the roost for both sides. It's disgusting on many levels. Just look at the health insurance lobby during the protracted HCR negotiations. Do you think Lieberman was open minded about the public option? His wife is in the industry and he took huge $ from the Conn based corporations.

    There is no such thing as competition anymore. Hell, my huge company is almost as bad with the $ they throw around.

    It isn't a surprise McCain disagrees; didn't the decision strike down provisions of his own finance reform bill (McCain-Feingold).

  8. #17
    Redshirt
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    76

    Default Re: Activist Supreme Court spits on Democracy

    The First Amendment requires 10 words for a sufficient stipulation: "Congress shall make NO LAW...abridging the Freedom of Speech."

  9. #18
    Ancient Arachnid Spider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,424

    Default Re: Activist Supreme Court spits on Democracy

    It is my belief that the Constitution must be interpreted based upon the spirit in which it was written, not the literal meaning of the words. The founding fathers did not anticipate people entering public places with assault rifles gunning down everyone in sight, the easy access and pervasive influence of the internet, or foreign corporations using the media to influence the will of the American people. Laws must keep up with society in order to be effective. This doesn't mean ignoring the Constitution, it means allowing it to grow while preserving its basic intent: protecting the individual from oppressive government.
    Atrophy: what you get when you win atournament.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

user tags

Nobody landed on this page from a search engine, yet!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •