Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 10 to 18 of 19
Discuss Mo Lawal is good but Olympic Gold? at the Freestyle & Greco-Roman Wrestling within the Wrestling Talk Forums; Lawal also won a period against Gatsalov last year....
  1. #10
    World Champ quick_single's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,986

    Default Re: Mo Lawal is good but Olympic Gold?

    Lawal also won a period against Gatsalov last year.

  2. #11
    AA Yazdani's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    719

    Default Re: Mo Lawal is good but Olympic Gold?

    Alright but that was he's next major competition. Whats your point Big? He lost to Yazdani and Ketoev there is still room for two more medals. I think Lawal has as good a chance as any.

  3. #12
    Big
    Big is offline
    Olympic Champ
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    On the forums
    Posts
    8,345

    Default Re: Mo Lawal is good but Olympic Gold?

    Quote Originally Posted by quick_single View Post
    Lawal also won a period against Gatsalov last year.
    so did Moradi

  4. #13
    ODH
    ODH is offline
    World Champ ODH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,968

    Default Re: Mo Lawal is good but Olympic Gold?

    Gee Big, why so negative about your 2nd favorite team?

  5. #14
    Hearts Zadick bluestater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    3,260

    Default Re: Mo Lawal is good but Olympic Gold?

    Well, Big, that's why they wrestle the matches.

  6. #15
    Big
    Big is offline
    Olympic Champ
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    On the forums
    Posts
    8,345

    Default Re: Mo Lawal is good but Olympic Gold?

    It just seems like Lawal had some flahes of success due to favorable circumstances but I don't see a real medal potential. His wins at Nationals just weren't convincing enough.

    Besides Ketoev and Yazdani you now have Temrezov and Abdusalamov. Also, both Lalievs. Danko, and Mindorashvili.

  7. #16
    Olympic Champ
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Parker, Az
    Posts
    3,388

    Default Re: Mo Lawal is good but Olympic Gold?

    Big - I had a response typed out but then it occured to me..... why would I waste my time? You are not looking for legitimate wrestling conversation. You are just trolling. Basically, you are the resident village idiot when the other ones get banned. But we like you anyhow because you are "our" village idiot, and every now and then you actually bring something of value to the conversation, as well as knowing the limits of decorum.
    I am 49, bald, ugly, and don't own a single cool thing. Kids like me though.

  8. #17
    Big
    Big is offline
    Olympic Champ
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    On the forums
    Posts
    8,345

    Default Re: Mo Lawal is good but Olympic Gold?

    Lawal doesn't have enough tools in my opinion. Leg attacks alone will not do it.

  9. #18
    NCAA Champ
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Soonerland
    Posts
    1,331

    Default Re: Mo Lawal is good but Olympic Gold?

    Quote Originally Posted by bluestater View Post

    You remember this dont you Big?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

user tags

site: lawal wrestling talk

mo lawal olympics

mo lawal vs mindorashvili

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •