Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Looks like I need an 84.

  1. #1

    Default Looks like I need an 84.

    Perry going to 74 apparently.

    Dont necessarily have to deal one of my 74s(ruth and Perry) but im open to it. I have two good guys at 49 as well. Send an offer.
    To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.

  2. #2
    Olympic Champ kr1963's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Clearwater, Florida, United States
    Posts
    7,028

    Default Re: Looks like I need an 84.

    sent u 2 offers

  3. #3

    Default Re: Looks like I need an 84.

    Got them.

    I'm more inclined to trade Mason/Ness than one of my 174s at this point. I like the idea of Perry/Ruth being my 74/flex combo at NCAAs.
    To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.

  4. #4
    Olympic Champ kr1963's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Clearwater, Florida, United States
    Posts
    7,028

    Default Re: Looks like I need an 84.

    u have THREE 174s now

  5. #5

    Default Re: Looks like I need an 84.

    Munster is not on my team anymore.

    I have Ruth and Perry at 74. This is what I call one of those good problems.

    Despite the nice start for Perry his chances of a high placement are much better at 74 than at 84.

    I'm not in desperation mode here.

    If I go into NCAAs with:
    Mcd
    Keith
    Dardanes
    Mason(or Ness)
    Lister
    Kokesh
    Ruth
    point scorer x
    Byers
    Z
    Flex: Perry

    That's a pretty tough team.

    Plus there's a rumor that Byers or Rosholt might be going to 84.

    As I said Ness/Mason is the one I'd like to trade the most.
    To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Looks like I need an 84.

    Byer's or Rosholt can't get to 184 effectively can they? That would surprise me a little I guess.
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  7. #7

    Default Re: Looks like I need an 84.

    Quote Originally Posted by goferphan View Post
    Byer's or Rosholt can't get to 184 effectively can they? That would surprise me a little I guess.
    Who knows if it's true. Could be complete BS, just something I read.
    To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •