Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 10 to 18 of 22

Thread: Iowa v. Minnesota BTN Replay Thoughts

  1. #10

    Default Re: Iowa v. Minnesota BTN Replay Thoughts

    I feel like this board uses size too much as an "excuse" with regards to Sanders. This guy wrestled 119 pounds in 2007 and was good enough to be high school national champ - are we really saying in 4 years he can't gain another 6 pounds and still be at the top of the heap? He's a great wrestler but just a notch below the best-of-the-best. No shame in that, but I'm not buying the size differential. The top3 wrestlers are simply better...

  2. #11

    Default Re: Iowa v. Minnesota BTN Replay Thoughts

    I guess I thought we were talking about hypothetical situations, not reality. I would assume that McDonough would need to be down 4 going in to the 3rd to most likely take neutral and just over a minute riding time.
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  3. #12
    Olympic Champ r.payton@att.net's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Danville .Indiana
    Posts
    8,718

    Default Re: Iowa v. Minnesota BTN Replay Thoughts

    You'd best loan Sanders a ball bat if you want him up 4 going in to the third against McD-

  4. #13

    Default Re: Iowa v. Minnesota BTN Replay Thoughts

    It's not that he doesn't weight 125 pounds. I'm sure that he does. It's the fact that the other guys shrink their 140+ pound bodies down to 125.0 pounds of "Steel." Once the big guys get their weight down it's a very tough match up giving up that much length/strength.

    Look at guys he's had trouble with:
    Mcd=Huge
    Esco=Huge(135 as senior in HS)
    Long=Now at 133
    Jarrod Garnett=Big, strong, explosive
    Anthony Robles=Freak Strength

    Sanders is very skilled but when he wrestles other guys with size and skill he struggles. You can discount his size as a disadvantage all you want, but in my opinion it is a factor.

    Do you think Sanders lost to Garnett because of Garnetts superior technique and conditioning? Or are there other factors in play?
    To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.

  5. #14

    Default Re: Iowa v. Minnesota BTN Replay Thoughts

    The only way sanders will ever beat McDonough is if McDonough forfeits. Gambrall quits in the third period. It doesn't matter if he is leading the match or losing. Trust me, I have watched him wrestle the last five years.

  6. #15

    Default Re: Iowa v. Minnesota BTN Replay Thoughts

    That's a pretty solid list of guys to lose too, just saying.
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  7. #16

    Default Re: Iowa v. Minnesota BTN Replay Thoughts

    Quote Originally Posted by vaisforlovers View Post
    Do you think Sanders lost to Garnett because of Garnetts superior technique and conditioning? Or are there other factors in play?
    Garnett beat him by 10 points and it was the first match at NCAAs, right after weigh-ins. Isn't that when these huge guys are most likely to struggle? I think he outwrestled him and was the better man that day. I think if you both weigh in at the same weight an hour (or is it longer at NCAAs?) before and you win by 10, you won on your wrestling ability.

  8. #17

    Default Re: Iowa v. Minnesota BTN Replay Thoughts

    As I said if they manage their weight properly. Garnett clearly did. Hour weigh ins don't matter if you are managing your weight properly.
    To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.

  9. #18

    Default Re: Iowa v. Minnesota BTN Replay Thoughts

    Fair enough, but I'm still of the opinion that he won stricly on wrestling ability that day and not size advantage. We'll agree to disagree.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •