Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 10 to 18 of 53

Thread: Metcalf v. Caldwell Stupidity

  1. #10
    World Champ
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,657

    Default Re: #1 Iowa v. #5 Minnesota Predictions/Results/Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by JensenS View Post
    This thread is not going to turn into Metcalf v. Caldwell.
    And yes I've got my Administrator hat on right now so bare that in mind.
    Seemed like all the other threads did that for about two months. Did you lose your hat?

    I really like Ness, but the Hawkeye Homer in me says that a healthy Dennis is a whole new problem for him. Yes, Ness deserves to be ranked higher now, because Oliver took advantage of Dennis's mat rust. But if Dennis is healthy (BIG "if"), he's a real handful at 133 (See Gomez.) If he can dominate Dennis, then I'd say Ness is the favorite for the title and maybe the Hodge.
    Let me put it this way. I'd much rather see Ness get the Hodge than Varner.

  2. #11

    Default Re: #1 Iowa v. #5 Minnesota Predictions/Results/Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by grapplefan View Post
    Seemed like all the other threads did that for about two months. Did you lose your hat?
    You want to show me where they did that for "about two months" here?

  3. #12

    Default Metcalf v. Caldwell Stupidity

    Moving all of the posts about Metcalf and Caldwell out of the Iowa v. Minnesota thread.

    Carry on here, if you must...

  4. #13
    World Champ
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,657

    Default Re: #1 Iowa v. #5 Minnesota Predictions/Results/Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by JensenS View Post
    You want to show me where they did that for "about two months" here?
    "Seemed like." I'm too lazy to look.

  5. #14

    Default Re: Metcalf v. Caldwell Stupidity

    I'm going to take that as code for "I made a boundless accusation and I have no evidence to back it up."

    That happened elsewhere, it didn't happen here.

  6. #15

    Default Re: Metcalf v. Caldwell Stupidity

    We got a little here. Just not to the extent of a couple of other places.
    RIP Jacob Schlottke; KR1963 and rpayton




  7. #16
    World Champ
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,657

    Default Re: Metcalf v. Caldwell Stupidity

    Quote Originally Posted by JensenS View Post
    I'm going to take that as code for "I made a boundless accusation and I have no evidence to back it up."

    That happened elsewhere, it didn't happen here.
    "Seemed" is not a "boundless accusation. Touch a nerve, did we?
    More like, not worth my time, kinda like this whole new thread to cleanse the other thread. Now can we move on?

  8. #17

    Default Re: Metcalf v. Caldwell Stupidity

    Quote Originally Posted by grapplefan View Post
    "Seemed" is not a "boundless accusation. Touch a nerve, did we?
    The fact that you're lying about something that did not happen touched a nerve.

  9. #18

    Default Re: Metcalf v. Caldwell Stupidity

    I saw this thread pop up in my "New Posts" and almost closed my browser. . .
    Quote Originally Posted by Flop The Nuts View Post
    [D]on't let lack of knowledge impact your ability to post as if you are knowledgeable.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •