Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 9 of 13

Thread: Trade: 174-pounder needed

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Dart Shark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    New Brighton, MN
    Posts
    2,866

    Default Trade: 174-pounder needed

    On my bench, I've got Grey, Molinaro, Barone, Oplinger and Polkowske.

    Willing to settle for a second-rate 174, since I just lost Rebertus (likely) for the year.

  2. #2
    Herbert DEC Askren 5-4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pier Village, NJ
    Posts
    3,021

    Default Re: Trade: 174-pounder needed

    I'd be willing to make this a 3 way blockbuster with Hamrah & Dragon on the table at 157. I kinda want Oplinger.
    I wish I could kick Matt Dragon in the balls. In his Dragonballz.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Trade: 174-pounder needed

    Trade me Kilgore or Nicholson and I'll give you one of my 74ers o_O
    Gold is an idiot.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Trade: 174-pounder needed

    If you trade him Kilgore I am quitting...the gift giving has gotten a little out of hand...i am going to be sure to send daily messages and christmas cards to stiffy next year in hopes that he wants to make trades
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  5. #5
    Super Moderator Dart Shark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    New Brighton, MN
    Posts
    2,866

    Default Re: Trade: 174-pounder needed

    No way am I giving up Kilgore. I'm actually kind of annoyed that people are just conceding their seasons and giving LoSt all the post-season firepower. As a long-time player of fantasy sports, it's a bit odd.

    I need a 174, I'm set all other weights, but I'll be honest, I don't need a superstar and I won't give up a superstar.

  6. #6
    Super Moderator Dart Shark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    New Brighton, MN
    Posts
    2,866

    Default Re: Trade: 174-pounder needed

    Quote Originally Posted by Gripsnhips View Post
    I'd be willing to make this a 3 way blockbuster with Hamrah & Dragon on the table at 157. I kinda want Oplinger.
    I'm set with JPO at 157, he's not getting many matches overall, but still a solid AA and Conference Champ option.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Trade: 174-pounder needed

    Quote Originally Posted by Dart Shark View Post
    No way am I giving up Kilgore. I'm actually kind of annoyed that people are just conceding their seasons and giving LoSt all the post-season firepower. As a long-time player of fantasy sports, it's a bit odd.

    I need a 174, I'm set all other weights, but I'll be honest, I don't need a superstar and I won't give up a superstar.
    I guess this is kind of directed at me since I just made a trade with him this week and I find it kind of ridiculous.

    When I made the trade I needed a 133 pounder, and I thought I needed one badly. We exchanged top 5 guys.

    I did pm you about possibly opening a discussion about trading one of my 174's for Grey, but I didn't hear anything back.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Trade: 174-pounder needed

    Quote Originally Posted by Dart Shark View Post
    No way am I giving up Kilgore. I'm actually kind of annoyed that people are just conceding their seasons and giving LoSt all the post-season firepower. As a long-time player of fantasy sports, it's a bit odd.

    I need a 174, I'm set all other weights, but I'll be honest, I don't need a superstar and I won't give up a superstar.

    Psshh...

    Cmon I had far and away the best set of picks from the supplemental thats whats made my team so strong, I've really only picked up two studs this year through trades, and Dennis is as good as Gallick or better so I dont see how you can say thats a gift.

    I will admit that jordan has more post season potential then Vince Jones but its not like Jones is a slouch either... he's ranked #11 in the country right now and he gets mad falls/bonus.

    Instead of getting annoyed at me making all of these moves why dont you make some of your own? I havent made any more trades this year then I did last year, thats just how I like to run my team. Obviously its paying off pretty well.





    Yeah Jensens made my team stronger by giving me Gallick, but I was already the front runner before that move anyway, and making that deal increases his chances of placing 2nd-4th (or even 1st, who knows). His team is going to have to fight tooth and claw just to make it to the post season, so why wouldnt he try to pick up a 133 pounder?

    Its not just the #1 spot that counts you know, I'm pretty sure the top 4 get money this year.
    Gold is an idiot.

  9. #9
    Super Moderator Dart Shark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    New Brighton, MN
    Posts
    2,866

    Default Re: Trade: 174-pounder needed

    Chest-beating, Chest-beating, Chest-beating.

    "I, I, I"

    You assume that none of your guys will get hurt or tank at conferences. It happens to studs.

    JensenS, I must have missed it. It's fantasy wrestling, so it's not like my boxers are in a bunch -- but man, yap yap yap yap yap.

    I just need a 174 to have a competitive team in hopes of quashing the hopes of Mr. Mouth.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •