Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 10 to 18 of 28

Thread: Lost/Grips Trade

  1. #10

    Default Re: Lost/Grips Trade

    Yep, fair enough. The league keeps evolving as I know last year it was certainly a test. Its great that we look at these issues to tighten them up even further. The only other thing I think that can be looked at again is scoring tournaments but even then you were plenty fair by posting the scoring tournaments ahead of time. People knew what they were going to be and certainly could have drafted accordingly. Its all good.
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  2. #11
    Super Moderator Dart Shark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    New Brighton, MN
    Posts
    2,866

    Default Re: Lost/Grips Trade

    Collusion!!!!

  3. #12

    Default Re: Lost/Grips Trade

    I love how gofer complains when me and him did the exact same thing last year...
    Gold is an idiot.

  4. #13

    Default Re: Lost/Grips Trade

    You and he didn't premake a plan last year. You reexchanged your guys when you started complaining.

  5. #14
    Herbert DEC Askren 5-4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pier Village, NJ
    Posts
    3,020

    Default Re: Lost/Grips Trade

    Lol. Listen, I don't care one way or another. Right now, rules are rules and I think we're allowed to do this.....and Jensen ok'd it. Even if Jensen wanted to say "no" now....i really wouldn't care.

    I don't need to think that I'm going about anything unfairly. I'd rather not even do the trade if that was the case.
    I wish I could kick Matt Dragon in the balls. In his Dragonballz.

  6. #15

    Default Re: Lost/Grips Trade

    I'm just busting your chops guys.
    http://www.youtube.com/TonyAvallone
    Dad of Karissa 155lb Varsity College Freshman

  7. #16

    Default Re: Lost/Grips Trade

    I said my piece to Jensens so its over. For his sanity I am leaving it alone.

    LoSt I do recall making trades with you last year but they were not trades that we said we were going to trade back at the time of the trade. We had questions about what weights guys were actually wrestling or whether they had serious injuries or not. These are not "LIKE" situations.

    I think that in the upcoming season there will have to be a "price" for trading after a certain date or a trade deadline so that the have's don't raid the have not's late in the season.

    I will concede this, it is not against the rules at current. In this instance its obvious to me that you are both temporarily filling holes for the week with each other's guys that have matches but that you don't have room for in your line-up so in essence you both are stretching your benches.

    If it looks like a duck and it walks like a duck...
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  8. #17
    Herbert DEC Askren 5-4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pier Village, NJ
    Posts
    3,020

    Default Re: Lost/Grips Trade

    first of all....i'm about to want no part of this. this is kinda pissing me off.

    I wasn't sure if it was cool or not and told loSt to check with jensen. What else do you want? And when it was ok.....the end. If it is ok....then it is OK. If you guys want to express your distaste fort his move....then say NO! OK to me doesn't mean everyone should be complaining about an acceptable strategy to fill in your blanks.

    Had LoSt not said..."trade back" would this be different? I mean....its a trade this week. Next week there is a good chance we'll trade back.

    LoSt....i'm all for cancelling this trade and just straight winning this league without this logical strategy....cause i don't wanna hear the blubbering. PM me and we'll cancel this.
    I wish I could kick Matt Dragon in the balls. In his Dragonballz.

  9. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gripsnhips View Post
    first of all....i'm about to want no part of this. this is kinda pissing me off.

    I wasn't sure if it was cool or not and told loSt to check with jensen. What else do you want? And when it was ok.....the end. If it is ok....then it is OK. If you guys want to express your distaste fort his move....then say NO! OK to me doesn't mean everyone should be complaining about an acceptable strategy to fill in your blanks.

    Had LoSt not said..."trade back" would this be different? I mean....its a trade this week. Next week there is a good chance we'll trade back.

    LoSt....i'm all for cancelling this trade and just straight winning this league without this logical strategy....cause i don't wanna hear the blubbering. PM me and we'll cancel this.
    Its exactly the trade back that makes it a unique issue...otherwise its just a trade...

    I just want clarification if it is in fact allowable, which evidently it is.

    Don't you think that might be news to others in the league?

    As far as complaining and blubbering I think you know that's not what I am doing.

    I played a pretty active role from day one with Jensens and Schlottke to help develop the rules and try to support the league. I am simply trying to help the league develop.

    I have no issue with either one of you and don't want headaches for Jensens. His ruling is final.

    I will always continue to look at ways of tightening down on obvious opportunities to close loopholes though.
    Posted via Mobile Device
    Last edited by goferphan; 11-19-2008 at 06:04 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •