Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 19 to 27 of 28

Thread: Sub Rule Clarification

  1. #19
    Herbert DEC Askren 5-4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pier Village, NJ
    Posts
    3,021

    Default Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    100% against the free agency idea.

    One of the reasons this league is the best is our off season knowledge. We all follow the off season tourneys, acquire injury reports, listen to a shitload of gossip and gamble on some freshmen.

    All before the wrestle offs!

    Free agency would become a game of tactical and non-strategic manipulations.

    My two cents.

    Extra Credit: Illustrate my point with good answers.
    Last edited by Gripsnhips; 11-09-2008 at 03:03 AM.
    I wish I could kick Matt Dragon in the balls. In his Dragonballz.

  2. #20
    Herbert DEC Askren 5-4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pier Village, NJ
    Posts
    3,021

    Find Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    Quote Originally Posted by goferphan View Post
    Yeah but if we all have the same opportunity and we get to draft 15 guys, we should be covered. I kind of like the thought of some teams having to hold on with 8,9 starters per week and try to limp to the supplemental until they can get some help. I know that both LoSt and I have three guys @ 141 and 174 and it feels like a bit of a burden right now but those could be good trade guys for us down the road.

    Also, we are able to do trades so this might spur more people to start looking at doing some in-season trades. Not too many trades occurred until the end run last year. Some people with teams that are stacked with studs 1-5 may lack depth and if someone gets hurt, they will need to go out and make trades or hang on until supplemental. Those that have depth but not too many studs may wish to package together some depth to get a stud who will score for them at conference and NCAA time. I think it makes it interesting and levels the playing field for guys who drafted differently.
    Include me as well. 3 157's and 3 174's.

    I like it though. Great options for Flex if you think about it.

    On another note, if you woulda asked me 2 months ago if 174 would have been one of the most heavily drafted weights, I woulda said no way.

    Isn't somebody looking for a solid 174?
    I wish I could kick Matt Dragon in the balls. In his Dragonballz.

  3. #21

    Default Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    Whats a free agency? Ive already lost one guy and had another guy move up in weight, but I guess thats not so bad. LAst year I had something like 9 points combined at three of my weights up until the supplimental draft, and I still barely missed the playoffs.

    I have 3 141s assukming hashimoto comes back.

    I would be open for a solid 174 gofer, I was really happy about how feist matched up with miller but now it appears feist is 197
    Gold is an idiot.

  4. #22

    Default Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    Quote Originally Posted by MOJO View Post
    his freshman backup goes out against Navy and Bakersfield and gets two Majors! I expected him to get his little Cardinal head pinched off! Baddass! Sweet rule! The commish is wise!
    Had Joe Baker not apparently fallen off the face of the earth he would have!

  5. #23

    Default Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    Like I said LoSt, I have Litton and Erwin.
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  6. #24

    Default Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    I will look into them and get back to you, what guys of mine would you be interested in? I have patterson, feist, Hashimoto (when he is back) and JBB that I would consider trading, I think everyone else is pretty much off limits
    Gold is an idiot.

  7. #25

    Default Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    Where is JBB wrestling? Which weight?
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  8. #26

    Default Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    He's Hofstra's 57 pounder...I'll give any deal you guys do an over/under of 6.5 days before one of you asks the other one to reverse it.

  9. #27

    Default Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    LOL...really, I was thinking 24 hours myself.
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •