Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 10 to 18 of 28

Thread: Sub Rule Clarification

  1. #10

    Default Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    Thank god for the supplemental draft. I wonder who thought of that genious idea?
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  2. #11

    Default Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    I'm kinda liking the other league's free agency deal. Since we are starting the year before all the line-ups are set in stone.
    RIP Jacob Schlottke 1984-2011




  3. #12

    Default Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    Yeah but if we all have the same opportunity and we get to draft 15 guys, we should be covered. I kind of like the thought of some teams having to hold on with 8,9 starters per week and try to limp to the supplemental until they can get some help. I know that both LoSt and I have three guys @ 141 and 174 and it feels like a bit of a burden right now but those could be good trade guys for us down the road.

    Also, we are able to do trades so this might spur more people to start looking at doing some in-season trades. Not too many trades occurred until the end run last year. Some people with teams that are stacked with studs 1-5 may lack depth and if someone gets hurt, they will need to go out and make trades or hang on until supplemental. Those that have depth but not too many studs may wish to package together some depth to get a stud who will score for them at conference and NCAA time. I think it makes it interesting and levels the playing field for guys who drafted differently.
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  4. #13

    Default Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    I just talking about covering guys who are injured or decide to RS before the season starts and you are left with guys that are Freshman or back-ups or in some cases with out a guy all together. not that it matters I can win with 11 or 12 guys
    RIP Jacob Schlottke 1984-2011




  5. #14

    Default Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    What's your status? Who have you lost so far? Who else do you know is out. I know LoSt mentioned Hashimoto but who else?
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  6. #15

    Default Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    Giesen, Casperman, Covington
    RIP Jacob Schlottke 1984-2011




  7. #16

    Default Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    I have two 174's I have no problem parting with.
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  8. #17

    Default Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    I'm good besides I don't have guys to trade really. I will be ok. Giesen should be replaced by Jake Johnson who wrestled 197 last year and was pretty good. The Casperman and Covington deals are screwy.
    RIP Jacob Schlottke 1984-2011




  9. #18
    National Finalist MOJO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    951

    Default Re: Sub Rule Clarification

    Man, thank goodness for this rule. My 133 flex dude Paulsen from Stanford starts out great, winning the Menlo open (non-scoring I know, but proves he can score a point or two), but gets injured there in the finals, so his freshman backup goes out against Navy and Bakersfield and gets two Majors! I expected him to get his little Cardinal head pinched off! Baddass! Sweet rule! The commish is wise!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •