05-25-2008, 05:19 PM
| #31 (permalink) | |
| NCAA Champ  Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,065
 |  Re: Forget Nickerson. Now your boy Ness is gonna get it! Quote:
2008 - The #1 & #3 finishers moved up from 125 2007 - The #1, #2, #3 and #4 finishers moved up from 125 2006 - The #1, #2 and #3 finishers moved up from 125 2005 - The #1, #2 and #3 finishers moved up from 125 That's an IMPRESSIVE history of success at 133 after moving up from 125. No reason to think that Ness can't do just as well. | |
|  |
|
05-25-2008, 05:48 PM
| #32 (permalink) |
| Olympic Champ Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: On the forums
Posts: 8,350
| Re: Forget Nickerson. Now your boy Ness is gonna get it! Maybe if Big spent less time on trying to create contraversies on line and spent more time developing social skills, he might some day be as knowlegeble about girls That would be a waste of time. Only losers "study" girls. |
|
| |
|
05-25-2008, 09:45 PM
| #34 (permalink) |
| Olympic Champ Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,117
| Re: Forget Nickerson. Now your boy Ness is gonna get it!
All depends on the individual athlete. Generally speaking, moving up = less strength, more energy (compared to bigger guys at the weight). The athlete's individual walk-around weight, reliance on speed and technique versus brute strength, confidence level and that stuff plays a factor... there's myriad examples of guys who did better at a higher weight, and at a lower weight, depending on how those factors balance out.
|
| |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
