Discuss big for weight class at the College Wrestling within the Wrestling Talk Forums; I dunno tho...mendes is definately jacked but hes not all that tall so IMHO hes ...
-
Redshirt
Re: big for weight class
I dunno tho...mendes is definately jacked but hes not all that tall so IMHO hes not all that big overall.
-
Re: big for weight class

Originally Posted by
vaisforlovers
Coleman is huge...nobody looks more out of place than Scott.
Mendes looks pretty damn big
-
Re: big for weight class

Originally Posted by
goferphan
Really, cause Ness is every bit as tall as he is.
I think Ness is actually taller
-
Redshirt
Re: big for weight class
Well I haven't seen any actuall college wrestlers that looked too big for their weight class, but I have seen a high school kid named Charlie Lipford who looks too big for his weight class, 103. Actually I don't think its actually big as in weight but imo hes tall for 103. I think he barely made that class though. He was wrestling 112 for like the whole season.
-
Re: big for weight class

Originally Posted by
its_yaboi_mboe
Well I haven't seen any actuall college wrestlers that looked too big for their weight class, but I have seen a high school kid named Charlie Lipford who looks too big for his weight class, 103. Actually I don't think its actually big as in weight but imo hes tall for 103. I think he barely made that class though. He was wrestling 112 for like the whole season.
I was gonna say Charlie Lipford but you beat me to it.
-
Re: big for weight class
Leen looked pretty good size for 57.
-
Re: big for weight class

Originally Posted by
Trusty
Leen looked pretty good size for 57.
Yep, I can't believe he wrestled 49 last year.
I'm going with the obvious - Coleman Scott, then I'd pick Mendes. Unless he's 4'6", he looks big for his weight class.
-
Redshirt
Re: big for weight class
Mendes looks scary big. That's why it shocked me when he lost. It was interesting the number of bigger "looking" stronger "looking" guys who lost last night.
-
Re: big for weight class

Originally Posted by
Flop The Nuts
Yep, I can't believe he wrestled 49 last year.
I'm going with the obvious - Coleman Scott, then I'd pick Mendes. Unless he's 4'6", he looks big for his weight class.
And don't forget that he started his career at 141! Heck, was that only two years ago when he gave the older Gallick a scare in the 1st round of NCAAs?
I disagree about Mendes, he was noticably shorter than everyone he wrestled. Wouldn't call him tiny or anything, but I definitely wouldn't consider him big for 141...

Nobody landed on this page from a search engine, yet!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules