Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 9 of 27

Thread: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......

  1. #1
    Herbert DEC Askren 5-4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pier Village, NJ
    Posts
    3,021

    Default Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......

    24-13 Nebraska

    If DS gets his decision.....thats an 8 point swing. Still not gonna do the trick.

    What do you all think about Nebraska vs Iowa?
    I wish I could kick Matt Dragon in the balls. In his Dragonballz.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......

    19-13 Iowa unfortunately...

    Donahoe, Oliver, and Jones by decision for Nebraska, Brester by major.

    Slaton, Leclere, Metcalf, Borschel, and Fields by decision, Perry by major.
    RIP Jacob Schlottke - 1984-2011

    "If Cornell finishes ahead of Iowa with five all americans I'll jump into the Des Moines River after finals." -Herkey#1 8/16/12

  3. #3
    Related To Gage Trusty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    4,429

    Default Re: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......

    Quote Originally Posted by JensenS View Post
    19-13 Iowa unfortunately...

    Donahoe, Oliver, and Jones by decision for Nebraska, Brester by major.

    Slaton, Leclere, Metcalf, Borschel, and Fields by decision, Perry by major.

    M* wins.
    21-9 Iowa

  4. #4

    Default Re: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......

    Quote Originally Posted by Gripsnhips View Post
    24-13 Nebraska

    If DS gets his decision.....thats an 8 point swing. Still not gonna do the trick.

    What do you all think about Nebraska vs Iowa?
    Unfortunately you can't in good conscience call a dual like that. If DS is there than you would have to assume that he picks up the win there and then C.P picks up his. We end up 17-0 with five matches to go. You can't assume that the last five were going to go that way again since 165, 174 and 184 were right down to the wire.

    I give Nebraska all the credit in the world because they wrestled hard and wrestled to win but if you give me DS back then you ain't pinning Kish again and that match is not the same. Just my opinion as always.
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  5. #5
    Olympic Champ ISU2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cedar Rapids
    Posts
    3,305

    Default Re: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......

    Donahoe had two back points...no doubt about it. He got Kesseled. I am a huge Ness fan, but he should have got beat.
    You do the math..... I'll do the alfredo!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

  6. #6

    Default Re: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......

    How do you figure?...if those were backs then you have to turn around and give Ness a reversal after that and we are right back where we started...I am going to go out on a limb and say there are a few other guys out there that aren't big Minny fans that agree that Ness won that match.
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  7. #7
    Herbert DEC Askren 5-4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pier Village, NJ
    Posts
    3,021

    Default Re: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......

    I feel that Ness won that match.
    I wish I could kick Matt Dragon in the balls. In his Dragonballz.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......

    Grips, the respected voice of reason.
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  9. #9
    Round of 12 goldengopher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs CO
    Posts
    464

    Default Re: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......

    Quote Originally Posted by goferphan View Post
    Unfortunately you can't in good conscience call a dual like that. If DS is there than you would have to assume that he picks up the win there and then C.P picks up his. We end up 17-0 with five matches to go. You can't assume that the last five were going to go that way again since 165, 174 and 184 were right down to the wire.

    I give Nebraska all the credit in the world because they wrestled hard and wrestled to win but if you give me DS back then you ain't pinning Kish again and that match is not the same. Just my opinion as always.
    I'm with you Gofer. DS is there and he picks up the win and I definately think someone between 165-184 wins as well. With that said congrats to NE as they wrestled a hell of a dual meet and won when they needed to.
    The NCAA selection committee just screwed the Gophers on seeding.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •