Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter....... College Wrestling  | | 
01-13-2008, 02:26 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Herbert DEC Askren 5-4
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Pier Village, NJ
Posts: 1,878
|  Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......
24-13 Nebraska
If DS gets his decision.....thats an 8 point swing. Still not gonna do the trick.
What do you all think about Nebraska vs Iowa?
__________________
"Ok Class. Today we will learn 'downward dog' to 'full bring'
|    
|  |  |
01-13-2008, 02:29 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Delaware
Posts: 7,710
| Re: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......
19-13 Iowa unfortunately... 
Donahoe, Oliver, and Jones by decision for Nebraska, Brester by major.
Slaton, Leclere, Metcalf, Borschel, and Fields by decision, Perry by major. |
| | |
01-13-2008, 02:31 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Related To Gage
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,530
| Re: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......
Originally Posted by JensenS  19-13 Iowa unfortunately...
Donahoe, Oliver, and Jones by decision for Nebraska, Brester by major.
Slaton, Leclere, Metcalf, Borschel, and Fields by decision, Perry by major. |
M* wins.
21-9 Iowa |
| | |
01-13-2008, 02:47 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Olympic Champ
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 7,000
My Mood:  | Re: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......
Originally Posted by Gripsnhips 24-13 Nebraska
If DS gets his decision.....thats an 8 point swing. Still not gonna do the trick.
What do you all think about Nebraska vs Iowa? | Unfortunately you can't in good conscience call a dual like that. If DS is there than you would have to assume that he picks up the win there and then C.P picks up his. We end up 17-0 with five matches to go. You can't assume that the last five were going to go that way again since 165, 174 and 184 were right down to the wire.
I give Nebraska all the credit in the world because they wrestled hard and wrestled to win but if you give me DS back then you ain't pinning Kish again and that match is not the same. Just my opinion as always.
__________________
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut."
|
| | |
01-13-2008, 03:03 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Cock of the walk
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Cedar Rapids
Posts: 2,441
My Mood:  | Re: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......
Donahoe had two back points...no doubt about it. He got Kesseled. I am a huge Ness fan, but he should have got beat.
__________________
[Wrestling] did nothing for comedy except for when I slammed people and thought it was funny. -Gerald Harris
|
| | |
01-13-2008, 03:12 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Olympic Champ
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 7,000
My Mood: | Re: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......
How do you figure?...if those were backs then you have to turn around and give Ness a reversal after that and we are right back where we started...I am going to go out on a limb and say there are a few other guys out there that aren't big Minny fans that agree that Ness won that match.
__________________
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut."
|
| | |
01-13-2008, 03:34 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Herbert DEC Askren 5-4
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Pier Village, NJ
Posts: 1,878
| Re: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......
I feel that Ness won that match.
__________________
"Ok Class. Today we will learn 'downward dog' to 'full bring'
|
| | |
01-13-2008, 03:35 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Olympic Champ
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 7,000
My Mood: | Re: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......
Grips, the respected voice of reason.
__________________
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut."
|
| | |
01-13-2008, 04:30 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Round of 12
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Colorado Springs CO
Posts: 420
My Mood:  | Re: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......
Originally Posted by goferphan Unfortunately you can't in good conscience call a dual like that. If DS is there than you would have to assume that he picks up the win there and then C.P picks up his. We end up 17-0 with five matches to go. You can't assume that the last five were going to go that way again since 165, 174 and 184 were right down to the wire.
I give Nebraska all the credit in the world because they wrestled hard and wrestled to win but if you give me DS back then you ain't pinning Kish again and that match is not the same. Just my opinion as always. | I'm with you Gofer. DS is there and he picks up the win and I definately think someone between 165-184 wins as well. With that said congrats to NE as they wrestled a hell of a dual meet and won when they needed to.
__________________
Golden Gophers The Great Collapse of March 2008 |
| | |
01-13-2008, 04:55 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Olympic Champ
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 7,000
My Mood: | Re: Minnesota didn't lose because of Dustin Schlatter.......
Nebraska finally got the stage they needed to get the respect that they deserve. You have to put them Top 3-5 next week.
__________________
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut."
|
| | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On | | |
|
