You are wrong. And I'm cool with being the Sucky Defending Super Bowl Champions. We can only hope to one day aspire to be the Moral Victory Champions like your beloved Redskins.
Don't bring football up though, I'm not looking forward to watching the Steelers' old ass defense try and chase after RGIII.
Going to need to lean on Roethlisberger this week. Given how hilariously bad Washington's DB's are though I suppose it isn't a bad place to be.
Vais made a statement (nobody is as aggressive against top level opposition), and I disagreed with it by posting a picture of Brent Metcalf making a funny face. You guys are connecting your own dots on a specious argument that somehow by saying that Metcalf WAS as aggressive regardless of opposition that Logan is a counterwrestler. Hardly a logical argument.
Here's what you guys have managed to do, logically speaking:
Premise 1 from Vais: Nobody is as aggressive against top level opposition.
Premise 2 from Zapp: Brent Metcalf was.
Conclusion from Jensen and Vais: Zapp agrees that Logan Stieber is a counterwrestler.
ETA: Regarding football, my advice is to aim at Madieu Williams and Josh Wilson's side of the field.
In which thread does this quote appear:
"Nobody (meaning Stieber, I guess) is as aggressive against top level opposition"?
Just curious, since I can't find you writing that in this thread.
It's still not computing for me, but I appreciate the effort.