Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 345678 LastLast
Results 46 to 54 of 69

Thread: Anyone else agree?

  1. #46

    Default Re: Anyone else agree?

    Quote Originally Posted by jammen View Post
    Danny Zilverberg has beaten them both.
    And has done absolutely nothing since those isolated freestyle wins 3 years ago.
    To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.

  2. #47

    Default Re: Anyone else agree?

    Quote Originally Posted by thaxton View Post
    tessari could hold his own and come out with a W against vinson, ness, and chamberlain(does he really still have eligibility left?). Oliver is untested at 49. i am very interested in seeing what he can do there. guessing he will be great, but its possible he can get a slap in face.
    He has shown he can roll with Vinson, he gave him a run in the match. I just think it's TOO many good guys for him to circumvent. Could he beat one or two of those guys? Sure. But over the course of the NCAA tournament. I don't see it. He almost never even attacks legs. I think that will come back to bite you eventually.
    To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.

  3. #48

    Default Re: Anyone else agree?

    Although cracking top 5 is highly, highly unlikely....I think OU has a great opportunity to make some noise this season. Two finalists (Howe and Maple) and 4 potential AAs (Patterson, Lester, Lester, Rutt). They have too many holes to perform at NCAAs, but they should have a solid dual team (could beat OSU). A dual featuring Oliver/Maple and Caldwell/Howe would be incredible.

    I have PSU winning again. Too many bonus points plain and simple. Iowa, Minny, and tOSU could make it close, but in the end they'll be fighting for second. Cornell and OSU will fight for 5th.

  4. #49

    Default Re: Anyone else agree?

    Actually, I think OU has a much stronger lineup than Cornell for this coming year. So they are 6th at worst in terms of pre-season rankings
    Gold is an idiot.

  5. #50

    Default Re: Anyone else agree?

    Quote Originally Posted by JKreisel View Post
    Although cracking top 5 is highly, highly unlikely....I think OU has a great opportunity to make some noise this season. Two finalists (Howe and Maple) and 4 potential AAs (Patterson, Lester, Lester, Rutt). They have too many holes to perform at NCAAs, but they should have a solid dual team (could beat OSU). A dual featuring Oliver/Maple and Caldwell/Howe would be incredible.

    I have PSU winning again. Too many bonus points plain and simple. Iowa, Minny, and tOSU could make it close, but in the end they'll be fighting for second. Cornell and OSU will fight for 5th.
    I would say that OU is a bigger threat at NCAA's than in duals, in light of said holes. Adding Howe and Rutt was huge. If Patterson and the Lesters put it together they could make a top 5 run.

  6. #51

    Default Re: Anyone else agree?

    Rutt is a potential finalist imo.
    To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.

  7. #52

    Default Re: Anyone else agree?

    Quote Originally Posted by LoSt View Post
    Don't get me wrong Tessari had a great season, but his weight really was quite weak.
    But not as weak as you thought. I'm surprised you are posting about 149 after your pronouncement last year that Dylan Ness is mediocre and overrated.
    "He beat nobodies..Thorn at 133 won't be great, R12 or worse imo...
    I just don't see it...David Thorn is not elite. I don't think he'll place"

  8. #53

    Default Re: Anyone else agree?

    Quote Originally Posted by vaisforlovers View Post
    Rutt is a potential finalist imo.
    I would agree with you--along with 4 or 5 others.

  9. #54

    Default Re: Anyone else agree?

    That's a sneaky good lineup for Oklahoma...

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •