Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 19 to 27 of 33

Thread: Minnesota v. Nebraska Results

  1. #19

    Default Re: Minnesota v. Nebraska Results

    It's B1G's tiebreaker in football:

    "If two teams are tied, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative."

  2. #20

    Default Re: Minnesota v. Nebraska Results

    Quote Originally Posted by jammen View Post
    It's B1G's tiebreaker in football:

    "If two teams are tied, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative."
    As you note, that's for determining who represents the B1G (usually in the Rose Bowl). But if 2 teams end up tied they're still "co-champions".

  3. #21

    Default Re: Minnesota v. Nebraska Results

    Quote Originally Posted by Herkey#1 View Post
    Not surprised that Dardanes beat Seuflohn but I bet it was a good match. They could see each other a lot throughout the next few years.
    Sueflohn pretty much dominated on number of shots, ties, etc., and nearly had him taken down several times with power doubles, but he relaxed on the edge one time and Dardanes took him down and that was the match. DC

  4. #22

    Default Re: Minnesota v. Nebraska Results

    Title clearly belongs to Minnesota. Not only did they win the head to head, but its not like they lost to a bad team for their one loss, I think Iowa's probably #3 in the conference and possibly #4 overall?
    Gold is an idiot.

  5. #23
    NCAA Champ BlueBloodLion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The same planet as you
    Posts
    1,010

    Default Re: Minnesota v. Nebraska Results

    Quote Originally Posted by Flop The Nuts View Post
    I'm sure you'd feel the same way if PSU had beaten Minny and both teams ended up 10-1?

    I don't see the logic of not giving weight to head-to-head, that should be the #1 tiebreaker in my opinion.
    The logic was mentioned before. Stretching the example-
    Both teams are 10-1
    One lost to a 10-1 team
    One lost to a 5-5 team

    Which team is better? Think before you answer...

    That's why I say, if you win 'em all, you're #1. If not, you don't have an argument for being the only #1, my team or otherwise.

  6. #24

    Default Re: Minnesota v. Nebraska Results

    Minny 2012 Big Ten Champs!!!!
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  7. #25

    Default Re: Minnesota v. Nebraska Results

    Quote Originally Posted by TomWright25 View Post
    As you note, that's for determining who represents the B1G (usually in the Rose Bowl). But if 2 teams end up tied they're still "co-champions".
    No, now they have a playoff between the Legends and Leaders champs. If two teams are tied for one of the division leads then they pick the winner of the head to head game as champ.

  8. #26

    Default Re: Minnesota v. Nebraska Results

    Quote Originally Posted by jammen View Post
    No, now they have a playoff between the Legends and Leaders champs. If two teams are tied for one of the division leads then they pick the winner of the head to head game as champ.
    Correct jammen. Thanks for the precision!

  9. #27

    Default Re: Minnesota v. Nebraska Results

    Quote Originally Posted by BlueBloodLion View Post
    The logic was mentioned before. Stretching the example-
    Both teams are 10-1
    One lost to a 10-1 team
    One lost to a 5-5 team

    Which team is better? Think before you answer...
    Lacking a head to head result then you have to go through all sorts of gyrations to figure out who should be champ.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •