Results 1 to 3 of 3
Discuss Intermat Rankings at the College Wrestling within the Wrestling Talk Forums; InterMat Wrestling...
  1. #1
    Olympic Champ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Danville .Indiana

    Default Intermat Rankings

    You know, I think I would rather be a man than a god . We don't need anyone to believe in us. We just keep going anyhow. It's what we do.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008

    Default Re: Intermat Rankings

    Wow, no love for Cornell. I thought they'd be ranked higher.

  3. #3
    Olympic Champ goferphan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Tampa, FL

    Default Re: Intermat Rankings

    Cornell kind of got screwed in that most people I think assumed Minnesota crapped the bed and would potentially beat them in a rematch. I don't like that concept. In fairness, they should be above Minnesota which means they should be no lower than #3. I find it interesting they make those assumptions with teams but in the case of a Little Ness, who people would think he would probably beat Eifert in a re-match, still snuck Eifert past Ness which is the right thing to do in the rankings in my opinion. That logic followed with the Steinhaus/Q match as well. They saw fit to not move Steinhaus above #5 with his victory over #1 but dropped Q behind him in the rankings to #6. I see the logic in that as well since Steinhaus lost to #3 Bosak and there is no reason to move him above the other three at 184 because they have not lost. The Cornell at #5 ranking doesn't follow logic or reason then based on that.

    That being said, rankings will always be a lightning rod, that's why I love looking at them when they come out.
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

user tags

Nobody landed on this page from a search engine, yet!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts