So where does this put Iowa on the Dual rankings NOW?
TOM had them the highest btw..
I think that maybe you have to make Iowa #1. They are undefeated. The only ones.
Re: So where does this put Iowa on the Dual rankings NOW?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kr1963
TOM had them the highest btw..
I think that maybe you have to make Iowa #1. They are undefeated. The only ones.
SHP had them #2, what did TOM have?
Re: So where does this put Iowa on the Dual rankings NOW?
I think its Iowa, Cornell and Penn State in that order.
Re: So where does this put Iowa on the Dual rankings NOW?
Iowa jumps to #2 behind Minny #1. Read it and weep Squawkers. There is no way Iowa jumps from 6th-11th with an upwt win.
Re: So where does this put Iowa on the Dual rankings NOW?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JAMMEN
Iowa jumps to #2 behind Minny #1. Read it and weep Squawkers. There is no way Iowa jumps from 6th-11th with an upwt win.
Given your track record with predictions, I will take this to the bank for sure.
Re: So where does this put Iowa on the Dual rankings NOW?
So they are good enough to go from 11th to 2nd, but not 1st? Makes total sense. That one spot in the rankings is obviously a huge leap.
Re: So where does this put Iowa on the Dual rankings NOW?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zapp Brannigan
SHP had them #2, what did TOM have?
I didn't look @ SHP's rankings. Is that his INDEX? Interesting if so...I like his system so that fits in my mind. TOM was #6. Everyone else was 8-11.
Re: So where does this put Iowa on the Dual rankings NOW?
Would it be out of line to ask, "who cares?"
The rankings meaning nothing except for creating a topic of debate for fans. From where I stand, the current structure of the national tournament has the tendancy to eliminate the importance of the rankings, doesn't it?
I hope, in the future, that a national team tournament becomes a reality so these rankings mean more.
Re: So where does this put Iowa on the Dual rankings NOW?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kdiddy1979
Would it be out of line to ask, "who cares?"
The rankings meaning nothing except for creating a topic of debate for fans. From where I stand, the current structure of the national tournament has the tendancy to eliminate the importance of the rankings, doesn't it?
I hope, in the future, that a national team tournament becomes a reality so these rankings mean more.
Agree 100%. Lehigh beat #1 Cornell and then gets thumped by VA Tech. Where do they belong?
Impressive performance by Iowa and if I was voted on a dual meet poll I would put them number 1. I still think the are a big underdog to win in March, but after today I would not count them out.