I think it was 4-4 with Ness barely over a mintue of RT in the 3rd but Ness got another TD and then got a fleeing the mat call. So it was probably 8-4 or so..
Re: Kauffman Brand Open Discussion (Video Directions Inside) I think it was 4-4 with Ness barely over a mintue of RT in the 3rd but Ness got another TD and then got a fleeing the mat call. So it was probably 8-4 or so..
Re: Kauffman Brand Open Discussion (Video Directions Inside) Slaton with a late TD to beat Laramie Schaffer (love that name) 6-5
Re: Kauffman Brand Open Discussion (Video Directions Inside) It needs to be said again, this announcer rules...
Re: Kauffman Brand Open Discussion (Video Directions Inside) I found video.
mms://live.upstreamnetworks.com/16345-48678
A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. A straw man argument can be a successful rhetorical technique (that is, it may succeed in persuading people) but it carries little or no real evidential weight, because the opponent's actual argument has not been refuted.
Re: Kauffman Brand Open Discussion (Video Directions Inside) Semi's at 125 and 133 are listed...
125: Zach Sanders v. Andrew Long, Terrance Young v. Michael Martinez
133: Joey Slaton v. Patrick Aleksanyan, Jayson Ness v. Montell Marion
Re: Kauffman Brand Open Discussion (Video Directions Inside) Interesting match up at Amateur 141 either coming up soon or just gone past. Ballweg v. Mincey
Re: Kauffman Brand Open Discussion (Video Directions Inside) Why Davis redshirted Graff is beyond me -he has dominated all his matches and lost to Ness 8-4 -pretty respectable score -better than most do against Ness.
Re: Kauffman Brand Open Discussion (Video Directions Inside) Originally Posted by r.payton@att.net
Graff is the one asking to RS
Re: Kauffman Brand Open Discussion (Video Directions Inside) Ballweg won 16-11
A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. A straw man argument can be a successful rhetorical technique (that is, it may succeed in persuading people) but it carries little or no real evidential weight, because the opponent's actual argument has not been refuted.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
