Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 28 to 36 of 56

Thread: 157lbs

  1. #28
    Related To Gage Trusty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    4,429

    Default Re: 157lbs

    Quote Originally Posted by goferphan View Post
    nah, too much talent at 157 for all these guys to go down and a guy like Hall to make that big of a leap
    Lets get this one on paper right now.
    Double or nothing on my 12 pack that I have not charged you intrest on? (I forgot how many months past due you are)

  2. #29

    Default Re: 157lbs

    Quote Originally Posted by Trusty View Post
    Lets get this one on paper right now.
    Double or nothing on my 12 pack that I have not charged you intrest on? (I forgot how many months past due you are)
    Really? I guess I can take the bet but as I said, the mixed 12 pack is sitting on top of my refrigerator. You have actually already earned it so I feel as if you are already owed this. My issue has been shipping since no one really wants to ship it when they find out its beer...LOL.

    I will take the bet however and since I do owe you interest then I guess we'll have to make another bet to settle that. You are taking Hall versus the entire field at 157?
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  3. #30

    Default Re: 157lbs

    Quote Originally Posted by JensenS View Post
    Given that Metcalf bumped up to 57 all of 0 times last year I would be.
    they had m* at 157 last year. Also I just feel like MEtcalf would want another crack at schlatter if the opportunity presented itself, but maybe you're right.


    How many times did askren bump up to 184 before he went up and beat kish at national duals?
    Gold is an idiot.

  4. #31

    Default Re: 157lbs

    Quote Originally Posted by goferphan View Post
    since its Ron Weasley's opinion that Sherfey was the better pick than Moley I can most assuredly take Moley to the bank.
    negative I said sherfey is better then chris brown. give credit where credit is due, I took Moley last year when no one really knew anything about him and he ended up being an all-american. He's a solid, solid guy.
    Gold is an idiot.

  5. #32

    Default Re: 157lbs

    Quote Originally Posted by LoSt View Post
    Also I just feel like MEtcalf would want another crack at schlatter if the opportunity presented itself, but maybe you're right.
    Had Dustin beat him last year maybe you'd have a point, but Metcalf seems to have gotten the "last word" in their rivalry.

    Quote Originally Posted by LoSt View Post
    How many times did askren bump up to 184 before he went up and beat kish at national duals?
    Askren didn't go up to 84 just for shits and giggles, that was a move to try and win the dual for them.

    As much as I hate to say it, given the way the two teams prospectively match up right now on paper in a dual meet format Iowa isn't going to need to bump Metcalf up to try and knock off Dustin to beat the Gophers.

  6. #33

    Default Re: 157lbs

    Quote Originally Posted by JensenS View Post
    Had Dustin beat him last year maybe you'd have a point, but Metcalf seems to have gotten the "last word" in their rivalry.



    Askren didn't go up to 84 just for shits and giggles, that was a move to try and win the dual for them.

    As much as I hate to say it, given the way the two teams prospectively match up right now on paper in a dual meet format Iowa isn't going to need to bump Metcalf up to try and knock off Dustin to beat the Gophers.
    Well, its certain that we will have a better candidate at 149 to go up against Metcalf then Mr. Mellmer.

    I like our match-up with Iowa next year since there is really no pressure on us to win it.

    125 Sanders v Falck
    133 Ness v Slaton
    141 Thorn v Tsirtsis/LeClere
    149 Mason v Metcalf
    157 DS v Morningstar
    165 Saf v Covington
    174 Glasser v Borschel
    184 Yohn v Keddy
    197 Eidensheink/Geiger v Beatty/Lofthouse/Johnson
    Hwt Berhow v Erekson

    Not saying we are going to win but I like this young team to go out and get some experience early versus Iowa this year and then possibly see them again at Duals and then again at Big Ten. Anyone else think we try to field a stronger team with Saf at 165 and Glasser at 174. Doesn't make sense to put one of those two on the bench and then start someone like Kaleb Young at 174. Whomever loses the wrestle-off goes up in my opinion. I also like our chances in the last two weights so if we can pull out a win at 157 maybe we can swing a win or two.
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  7. #34

    Default Re: 157lbs

    125: Falck dec
    133: Ness dec
    141: I'd like to see thorn wrestle before I make a call here, but they wrestled two years ago and thorn got pinned.
    149: Metcalf by dismantling
    157: Schlatter by dec (He could major if he finds his offense at his new weight)
    165: Saf by dec
    174: Borschel by major
    184: Keddy by major
    197: Iowa
    HVY: This is one of the few matchups in the meet I see being competitive at this point (Obviously my perspective might change once I see some of these young guys wrestle)
    Right now I like berhow, he showed a lot of potential last year.

    Minnesota has very little chance at winning this dual or even keeping it close, but hopefully ness will be able to show slaton whats up
    Gold is an idiot.

  8. #35

    Default Re: 157lbs

    Well if you are giving Minny 133, 157 and 165 and as far as I am concerned we have just as much talent at 197 and Heavy how do you think we can't keep it close? Just wondering?
    "Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until they speak."

  9. #36

    Default Re: 157lbs

    Quote Originally Posted by goferphan View Post
    Well if you are giving Minny 133, 157 and 165 and as far as I am concerned we have just as much talent at 197 and Heavy how do you think we can't keep it close? Just wondering?
    Because I see Iowa picking up bonus points at a lot of weights. Also consider that ness could lose to slaton but theres no way that metcalf/borschel/keddy/tshirts are going to lose (unless thorn has improved DRAMATICALLY). That means they have four that are pretty much locked so all they have to do is win one of the remaining 6 matches and they will win the dual. Even if we won both heavy and 197 and swept the matches we are favored in sanders would still have to upset falck

    Maybe it will end up being close but I think Iowa takes this by at least 6 or so
    Gold is an idiot.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •