If DS beats Cyler is everyone going to say that that is an upset? Don't think so...
If DS beats Cyler is everyone going to say that that is an upset? Don't think so...
for the purposes of this thread I believe we are going with the seeds as established in the brackets.
Feel free to start another thread about upsets that aren't really upsets and seeds that are incorrect.
Super 32 Challenge - October 26-27, 2013
"Good things happen when you wrestle for a full seven minutes." -- Jayson Ness, post-finals press conference
real men type in purple![]()
Super 32 Challenge - October 26-27, 2013
"Good things happen when you wrestle for a full seven minutes." -- Jayson Ness, post-finals press conference
Keddy over Smith
RIP Jacob Schlottke 1984-2011
Super 32 Challenge - October 26-27, 2013
"Good things happen when you wrestle for a full seven minutes." -- Jayson Ness, post-finals press conference
Get out of the wrong side of the bed?
Where does it say that?
It doesn't. It's your assumption.
I think SOME people on here ARE debating whether the seeds are valid or not, that's why it's called a sport & that's why they play the game, cuz nothing ever completely plays out as one expects 100% of the time.
However if you look back on what I said, from your viewpoint that Pataky would be an upset based upon the seeds I agreed as there is nothing to disagree with. The seeds are the seeds.
I noticed that neither you or Jens had ANY response to my question of DS vs CS. By the seeds that would be an UPSET. BUt my point is I would bet that if we surveyed everyone on the Board, they would disagree. Hence in that instance the seeds go against popular opinion & that's what this is all anyways. Just opinion...![]()
