Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 10 to 18 of 18

Thread: How low is LoSt?

  1. #10

    Default Re: How low is LoSt?

    I do have to say, the more I think about this, the more interesting it gets. I am not even sure what V Tech looked like last year but I say with all of those upper classmen in the line-up last year, it pulls some of the other guys performances up as well. LoSt may be able to prove that individually it doesn't add up but I think its probable that they would have finished Top 10. Its alot like fantasy duals though, you just can't prove it one way or the other. That being said, what would VT have looked like last year?

  2. #11

    Default Re: How low is LoSt?

    Looks like possibly:

    125 Garnett
    133 Diaz (possible)
    141 LeClere/Slaton/Diaz
    149 Metcalf
    157 Dong/Yates
    165 Epperly
    174 Borschel
    184 Trongone/Spellman
    197 D.J. Bruce
    Hwt Marone...

    Pretty solid.

  3. #12

    Default Re: How low is LoSt?

    Quote Originally Posted by goferphan View Post
    Looks like possibly:

    125 Garnett
    133 Diaz (possible)
    141 LeClere/Slaton/Diaz
    149 Metcalf
    157 Dong/Yates
    165 Epperly
    174 Borschel
    184 Trongone/Spellman
    197 D.J. Bruce
    Hwt Marone...

    Pretty solid.
    Lol, if that's not a top 10 team, not sure what is.

    Don't forget slaton made 33 once last year. He lost his starting job to about an equal in Dennis. With that much of a disparity at 33 he'd certainly get the job late in the year and make the weight with the pound allowance and very likely AA.
    To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.

  4. #13

    Default Re: How low is LoSt?

    Thanks VA, I wasn't sure if it had been Slaton or LeClere that made 133...wow so thats:

    125 Garnett
    133 Slaton/Diaz
    141 LeClere/Slaton/Diaz
    149 Metcalf
    157 Dong/Yates
    165 Dong/Epperly
    174 Borschel
    184 Trongone/Spellman
    197 D.J. Bruce
    Hwt Marone...

    Nice squad...who knows who else that team could have recruited there with those juniors in tow.

  5. #14

    Default Re: How low is LoSt?

    Quote Originally Posted by wdanforth View Post
    Lost spells like Kentucky_Mudflap.
    Hahahahahahaha...

    I love this for the Mudflap reference, the sheer randomness of it and because when I initially read it I thought it said that "Lost smells like Kentucky_Mudflap."

  6. #15

    Default Re: How low is LoSt?

    wdanforth IS Kentucky_Mudflap and he was TRYING to say SMELLS...

  7. #16

    Default Re: How low is LoSt?

    Quote Originally Posted by vaisforlovers View Post
    Lol, if that's not a top 10 team, not sure what is.

    Don't forget slaton made 33 once last year. He lost his starting job to about an equal in Dennis. With that much of a disparity at 33 he'd certainly get the job late in the year and make the weight with the pound allowance and very likely AA.
    Slaton was not going to get down and perform last year..

    There is no way Diaz would make 133

    Epperly=has never won a match at ncaas
    Spellman=Not AA caliber
    Bruce=Bad
    Gold is an idiot.

  8. #17

    Default Re: How low is LoSt?

    Quote Originally Posted by LoSt View Post
    Slaton was not going to get down and perform last year..

    There is no way Diaz would make 133

    Epperly=has never won a match at ncaas
    Spellman=Not AA caliber
    Bruce=Bad
    I see your points, but I am a bit hesitant, since you are an idiot.
    To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.

  9. #18

    Default Re: How low is LoSt?

    Don't tell me those guys being in the wrestling room weren't going to make them better and I just love your insinuations:

    Slaton: would never perform at 133
    Diaz: would never make 133
    Epperly: has never won an NCAA match
    Spellman: not AA material
    Bruce: Bad

    The difference between VT and 10th last year you said would have been 4 points? I say that team would have gotten there, you say they wouldn't. And as VA has already pointed out, you are an idiot. Let's call it a wash but a very interesting discussion.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •