125: Nickerson v. Sanders
Robles is fun to watch when he gets control from top, but until that happens his matches are no more exciting than anyone else's IMO. Sanders pushes the pace a little more, and I'm interested to see how he's improved.
133: Ness v. Oliver
I can agree with this. It will be a great barometer of how "for real" Oliver is. Oliver vs. Hochstrasser would also be great, too, since Hochstrasser goes after it.
141: Humphrey v. ???
I agree-Hump vs. any top guy will be fun. Personally, I think the bump will leave him with a bunch more energy and as a result he won't sit on leads as much. I think he'll come back much improved and run away with the title. Anyway, if Slaton starts for Iowa, that's probably the one I'll look forward to seeing most.
149: Palmer v. Metcalf
The Cathell match doesn't really interest me all that much, and I would be very surprised if Lance didn't win it. Clearly Metcalf is the favorite in this match after winning all 3 of their matches, but I think Lance has a chance. I also think he's more motivated than he has been in the past, I won't say why though.
I would have really been interested to see how Garrett Scott would look against top competition, but............
157: Burroughs v. JPO
I'll agree just because it was so close last year. Really, Burroughs should be fun to watch against about anyone, but I don't think I'd list any of his matches to be one of my most anticipated because I think he will dominate them all. I'm anxious to see whether he has continued to improve in general, though.
165: Schlatter v. Howe
I like this matchup because Howe has such great positioning and defense. If Dustin can generate much offense, we know that he is sort of "back."
174: There are a few guys I want to see, but no matchups really jump to the top.
184: Pucillo v. Askren, Pucillo v. Keddy
Askren because he creates a lot of action and has a unique style that I don't think I've seen Mikey face. Also, it will show how much of a factor Askren is at 184. Pucillo vs. Keddy for obvious reasons.
197: I more or less agree with Jensens...