Wrestling Talk | NCAA, High School, Pro, & College Wrestling
Wrestling Gear
Wrestling Shoes Wrestling Headgear Wrestling Singlets
Wrestling Kneepads Officiating Gear Wrestling Bags
wrestling
Go Back   The Wrestling Talk Forums > Blogs > gg121and2

Rate this Entry

Do we want wrestling to be more popular - or not?

Posted 05-05-2008 at 06:20 AM by gg121and2
Do we want wrestling to be more popular – or not?




The debate continues to escalate. Yesterday (May 4th), Martin Floreani of flowrestling.com posted a blog in which he states that wrestling is an “underground sport” and that initiatives to get more television coverage are “diluting our sport”.

http://www.flocasts.org/flowrestling...p?u=671&v=blog

I’m just a fan of the “world’s oldest and greatest sport”. I’ve always made it clear that I never wrestled, never had any family that wrestled and have no ties to any wrestling-related organization. I just want to watch more wrestling. Frankly, I’m not sure that either side of the argument is concerned enough with the fans’ viewpoint.
There is a commonly held belief that the potential viewing audience for all forms of amateur wrestling is small. More than one “authority” has written that only ex-wrestlers or their families will watch wrestling. That notion is misguided. Yes, from my seats in Section GG of the nation’s most raucous (and most populated) wrestling venue – Carver Hawkeye Arena – I see what wrestling can be – sports entertainment that can appeal to a broader audience.

No – I’m not naïve enough to think that some day wrestling will surpass football or basketball in American viewer popularity, but, jeez – the World Series of Poker?

First – take a few steps backward and improve the product. Yes, from the fan’s perspective, all forms of wrestling used to be more exciting. Is this “diluting the sport”? I think not. I recently posted freestyle match videos of John Smith, Randy Lewis and Ed Banach on a couple of different wrestling sites and the reaction was enlightening. Fans want scoring far more than they want “fighting for good position”. Yes, this will require once again tinkering with the rules, which in itself challenges the fans. More important then rule changes, however, is the need for a philosophical change among coaches and athletes. If you want fans in the seats – score some points! Pin some people! If you’re content with wrestling in an empty gym – well – you’re headed down the right path.

Fan base growth can only come from greater exposure – television. The 30+ years that Iowa Public Television has aired college wrestling has certainly contributed to the popularity of the sport in Iowa.

Does this mean that the internet has no role? Of course not! Online sites like intermatwrestle.com, themat.com, flowrestling, revwrestling and the various team message board sites all serve to heighten a new fan’s interest. This ought to be a conscious effort.

Look at the Dancing with the Stars phenomenon. How can that show be as popular as it is? For one thing – the network created an online element to the broadcast package from the very beginning. Could that carry over to wrestling coverage? You bet. Here’s a scenario. During a wrestling broadcast the on-air team would frequently mention the broadcast website. Viewers could be encouraged to vote for the “most valuable” wrestler of the event or enticed to view video of past matches involving that evening’s competitors. Someone just needs to think creatively.

Which leads us to the primary problem – too many organizations and institutions working at cross-purposes. American wrestling is governed or influenced by the US Olympic Committee, FILA, the National Wrestling Coaches Association, USA Wrestling and the NCAA (and so on). Each has its’ own priorities and its’ own marketing and promotional efforts. There appears to be little coordination. Why not create a “wrestling marketing board” to oversee a unified promotional effort? To avoid the “too many chefs” effect, their biggest task would be to hire a good marketing agency and let the agency do its job. The board could be funded in a couple of ways. One possibility is a “checkoff” system similar to that formerly used by the Beef Industry Council and the National Pork Producers. Each participating institution would add 50 cents to a dollar to every membership fee, ticket price or entry fee. All of that money would go into the pooled marketing fund. Corporate sponsorships would also play a role.

Do we want wrestling to be more popular – or not? If the answer is “yes”, changes need to be made.

Total Comments 2

Comments

Old
great. i agree.
permalink
Posted 05-25-2008 at 08:26 AM by bulwrest bulwrest is offline
Old
MatDaddy's Avatar
I think you're right on with the sponsorship and advertising comments. Wrestling is an "endangered sport" in my view. The more we can broaden our scope and introduce it to the American public, the longer we'll be able to keep College and high school wrestling available to student-athletes. Programs are being cut year after year ( and we all know why), it's time we stood together and A) showed people why we love this sport so much (i.e. Marketing and promoting the sport to gain exposure), and B) Challenge laws discriminating against and threatening our sport.
permalink
Posted 06-09-2008 at 12:54 AM by MatDaddy MatDaddy is offline
Updated 06-17-2008 at 10:26 PM by Schlottke
 

Report Bug

Search Engine Friendly URLs by SEO 3.2.0 RC7