The Wrestling Talk Forums - View Single Post

ban basketball · 05-25-2008, 03:35 PM

In short, the court ruled that the method of recounting violated the 14th Amendment's equal protection under the laws clause, as the differing methods of recounting were making it possible where some votes may be counted twice. Well, ok, fair enough I guess...

...but here is where the problem lies, and why not one attorney will back this ruling: How do you rule based on the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause, yet willfully thrown out thousands of other votes and not count them?

That is the problem, and few people (1) even know what they rule or (2) don't care, as they got the result that they wanted.

05-25-2008, 03:35 PM	#8 (permalink)
ban basketball NCAA Champ Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Iowa Posts: 1,432 Tournaments Joined: 0 Tournament Wins: 0	Re: Recount In short, the court ruled that the method of recounting violated the 14th Amendment's equal protection under the laws clause, as the differing methods of recounting were making it possible where some votes may be counted twice. Well, ok, fair enough I guess... ...but here is where the problem lies, and why not one attorney will back this ruling: How do you rule based on the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause, yet willfully thrown out thousands of other votes and not count them? That is the problem, and few people (1) even know what they rule or (2) don't care, as they got the result that they wanted. __________________ UNI Panthers...23 Consecutive West Regional Titles!! UNI Panthers...Back On The All-American Podium Again!! My ignore list: Cyclone85; skipster; tight-waist; Ignatius J. Reilly.