View Single Post
Old 09-17-2008, 01:40 PM   #26 (permalink)
National Finalist
 
WrestlingTerp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dayton, Maryland
Posts: 782
My Mood:
Tournaments Joined: 0
Tournaments Won: 0
WrestlingTerp is a National ChampionWrestlingTerp is a National ChampionWrestlingTerp is a National ChampionWrestlingTerp is a National ChampionWrestlingTerp is a National ChampionWrestlingTerp is a National Champion
Default Re: Smoking bans based on effects of second hand smoke are a sham!

Initial results: As of Feb 22, 2007, the study protocol has been completed for a total of 5 bars and 12 employees. One of the 5 bars was a voluntary smoke-free establishment. In the remaining 4 bars, smoking was allowed. Air nicotine was detected in all the bars where smoking was allowed (range 2.1 to 16.9 µg/m3). In the smoke-free bar, air nicotine concentrations were much lower (range 0.11 to 0.15 µg/m3) and close to the limit of detection. In non-smoking employees working in bars where smoking was allowed, hair nicotine ranged from 0.7 to 6.1 ng/mg, documenting that workers in smoking bars are personally exposed to tobacco smoke by others. In the smoke-free bar, hair nicotine concentrations were below the limit of detection, documenting that smoke-free bars can provide complete protection to employees from exposure to secondhand smoke.
Here is what the JHU study reported about nicotine levels. I highlighted it to make it easier for you. Seems to me you are misreading the chart, or reading it the way you want it to read.

Now compare that to the large body of evidence that proves exposure to second hand smoke is a known health rish and the facts speak for themselves. Thank God Maryland law now mandates smoke-free establishments.

Your "facts" have proven to be pretty meaningless without significant supporting evidence.
__________________
"Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!”
Send me a PM Send Me a Gift My Albums
Reply With Quote
Advertisement